Skip to main content

Table 3 Statistical values of datasets for maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses

From: Variation in Botryosphaeriaceae from Eucalyptus plantations in YunNan Province in southwestern China across a climatic gradient

Genus Dataset Maximum likelihood
   Subst. modela NSTb Rate matrix p-inv Gamma Rates
Botryosphaeria ITS TrN + I 6 1.0000 1.5461 1.0000 1.0000 5.4052 0.7570 – Equal
  tef1 TVM + I 6 1.2703 4.1281 1.8345 0.0377 4.1281 0.5680 – Equal
  tub2 TIM2 + G 6 0.2584 4.1669 0.2584 1.0000 8.5072 – 0.0280 Gamma
  rpb2 TPM3uf + I 6 2872.6267 37,884.9415 1.0000 2872.6267 37,884.9415 0.7290 – Equal
  ITS/tef1/tub2 TrN + I 6 1.0000 3.6483 1.0000 1.0000 6.4337 0.7430 – Equal
Lasiodiplodia ITS TPM1uf + I + G 6 1.0000 8.3069 3.1151 3.1151 8.3069 0.6640 0.7300 Gamma
  tef1 TrN + G 6 1.0000 3.1913 1.0000 1.0000 5.0207 – 0.4440 Gamma
  tub2 TIM3 + G 6 2.6726 3.8861 1.0000 2.6726 10.7258 – 0.4200 Gamma
  rpb2 TrN + I + G 6 1.0000 4.7971 1.0000 1.0000 13.7321 0.4690 1.8510 Gamma
  ITS/tef1/tub2/rpb2 TIM2 + I + G 6 1.2861 4.0643 1.2861 1.0000 8.3643 0.5010 0.6480 Gamma
Neofusicoccum ITS TIM1 + I + G 6 1.0000 10.7228 2.7330 2.7330 23.3748 0.5420 0.5670 Gamma
  tef1 TPM2uf + G 6 1.6352 7.1729 1.6352 1.0000 7.1729 – 0.6840 Gamma
  tub2 TIM3 + G 6 1.9226 7.3114 1.0000 1.9226 12.7028 – 0.2070 Gamma
  rpb2 TIM3 + G 6 2.4608 9.3031 1.0000 2.4608 24.9646 – 0.2660 Gamma
  ITS/tef1/tub2/rpb2 TrN + I + G 6 1.0000 5.0967 1.0000 1.0000 9.7420 0.4430 0.7340 Gamma
Genus Dataset No. of taxa No. of bpc Maximum parsimony  
     PICd No. of trees Tree length CIe RIf RCg HIh  
Botryosphaeria ITS 49 530 30 86 51 0.8039 0.8913 0.7165 0.1961  
  tef1 49 353 115 120 152 0.8684 0.9385 0.8150 0.1316  
  tub2 42 414 22 35 30 0.8000 0.9063 0.7250 0.2000  
  rpb2 30 718 23 4 37 0.8378 0.9483 0.7945 0.1622  
  ITS/tef1/tub2 49 1297 167 234 241 0.8174 0.9085 0.7427 0.1826  
Lasiodiplodia ITS 74 511 50 5000 91 0.6813 0.8858 0.6035 0.3187  
  tef1 73 323 135 1233 415 0.6024 0.8922 0.5375 0.3976  
  tub2 64 409 41 5000 60 0.7667 0.9310 0.7138 0.2333  
  rpb2 53 532 104 3297 192 0.6354 0.8649 0.5496 0.3646  
  ITS/tef1/tub2/rpb2 74 1775 330 3989 854 0.5621 0.8508 0.4782 0.4379  
Neofusicoccum ITS 99 535 86 1790 205 0.5512 0.8844 0.4875 0.4488  
  tef1 98 307 150 5000 312 0.7308 0.9413 0.6879 0.2692  
  tub2 98 424 72 1380 149 0.6040 0.8952 0.5407 0.3960  
  rpb2 76 605 116 2619 201 0.6915 0.9180 0.6348 0.3085  
  ITS/tef1/tub2/rpb2 101 1871 424 3584 936 0.6090 0.8968 0.5461 0.3910  
  1. a Subst. model = best fit substitution model
  2. b NST Number of substitution rate categories
  3. c bp Base pairs
  4. d PIC Number of parsimony informative characters
  5. e CI Consistency index
  6. f RI Retention index
  7. g RC Rescaled consistency index
  8. h HI Homoplasy index
Back to article page

IMA Fungus

ISSN: 2210-6359

Contact us