Table 7 Comparison of results where “continent filtering” was applied
From: Species determination using AI machine-learning algorithms: Hebeloma as a case study
Metrics (/100) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class | CG | Continent filtering | Top 1 | Top 3 | Top 5 | MRR | F1m |
Species | 7 | Not filtered | 75.0 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 85.2 | 72.4 |
Species | 7 | Filtered | 75.6 | 95.7 | 98.8 | 85.8 | 73.3 |
Species | 8 | Not filtered | 76.7 | 95.8 | 99.2 | 86.5 | 72.1 |
Species | 8 | Filtered | 77.7 | 96.2 | 99.4 | 87.1 | 73.5 |
Section | 7 | Not filtered | 94.2 | 99.7 | 99.9 | 96.8 | 80.0 |
Section | 7 | Filtered | 94.9 | 99.4 | 99.9 | 97.2 | 82.8 |
Section | 8 | Not filtered | 94.5 | 99.4 | 100.0 | 97.0 | 80.0 |
Section | 8 | Filtered | 94.5 | 99.4 | 100.0 | 97.0 | 80.0 |