Table 3. Morphological comparison of two representative isolates from Indonesia, South Africa, Thailand, and Uruguay. Ten measurements were taken ofeach structure and the (minimum-) average minus standard deviation — average plus standard deviation and (-maximum) given below.

Ascomatal bases

Shape

Globose

Globose

Globose

Globose

Length

(125–)162–199(–200)

(120–)142–190(–202)

(188–)190–197(–200)

(144–)170–197(–200)

Width

(143–)173–193(–200)

(132–)143–193(–216)

(154–)177–199(–212)

(141–)164–184(–197)

Ascomatal necks

Length

(390–)400–450(–470)

(372–)392–460(–486)

(354–)370–400(–424)

(354–)368–386(–409)

Width (bases)

(24–)25–35(–40)

(24–)25–35(–42)

(24–)25–35(–39)

(23–)26–32(–38)

Width (apices)

(15–)16–18(–20)

(15–)16–20(–22)

(16–)17–19(–20)

(15–)16–22(–25)

Ostiolar hyphae

Shape

Divergent

Divergent

Divergent

Divergent

Length

(36–)43–53(–63)

(39–)40–52(–62)

(33–)35–39(–41)

(38–)41–51(–53)

Ascospores

Length

3–5

3–5

3–4

3–4

Width (excluding sheath)

4–6

4–6

4–6

4-6

Width (including sheath)

5–8

5–7(–8)

5–7

6–7

Primary phialides

Length

(69–)70–100(–134)

(73–)76–114(–131)

(67–)76–96(–100)

(73–)75–83(–88)

Width (bases)

4–6

4–6

4–6

2–4

Width (broadest point)

4–6

4–6

6–8

4–5

Width (apices)

3–5

3–5

3–5

3–4

Secondary phialides

Length

(60–)70–100(–143)

(64–)69–109(–143)

(63–)68–77(–99)

(69–)72–96(–109)

Width (bases)

3–6

3–6

5–6

3–6

Width (apices)

5–7

5–7

4–8

6–8

Primary conidia

Length

(13–)19–20(–24)

(15–)18–24(–25)

(10–)13–17(–18)

(10–)11–15(–18)

Width

4–5

4–5

3–4

2-3

Secondary conidia

Length

6–8

6–8

6–8

(7–)9–11

Width

5–8

5–7

5–8

6–8

Chlamydospores

Shape

Globose/Subglobose

Globose/Subglobose

Globose/Subglobose

Globose/Subglobose

Length

10–15

10–13

12–15

(6–)7–11(–13)

Width

8–13

8–10

10–13

(5–)7–11(–12)