Table 3 Performances of algorithms in mapping FASTQ files of different size with large reference libraries.
Library | Algorithm | FASTQ | Time Performances | Mapping parameters | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
acronym | sequences | strain | reads | Mapping time (sec) | CPU-time (sec) | used reads | unused reads | Matches | min pairwise identities | max pairwise ideniies | |
15,565 | BTL | A | 21,238 | 63 | 33,34 | 18,274 | 2,964 | 684 | 74,00% | 100% | |
CBS | B | 58,263 | 99 | 123 | 54,822 | 3,441 | 661 | 91,00% | 100% | ||
ITS | BBm | A | 21,238 | 80 | 39,82 | 18,323 | 2,915 | 626 | 68,20% | 100% | |
B | 58,263 | 114 | 49,57 | 55,675 | 2,588 | 708 | 62,30% | 100% | |||
34,683 | BTL | A | 21,238 | 186 | 104 | 19,163 | 2,075 | 2,051 | 73,40% | 100% | |
CBS | B | 58,263 | 273 | 393 | 57,140 | 1,123 | 2,457 | 79,50% | 100% | ||
ITS-LSU | BBm | A | 21,238 | 204 | 109 | 19,000 | 2,238 | 1,939 | 58,80% | 100% | |
B | 58,263 | 311 | 161 | 56,930 | 1,333 | 2,445 | 63,60% | 100% | |||
2,727 | BTL | A | 21,238 | 16,7 | 13,59 | 13,904 | 7,334 | 319 | 74,10% | 100% | |
ISHAM | B | 58,263 | 30,3 | 33,5 | 36,416 | 21,847 | 297 | 82,00% | 100% | ||
ITS | BBm | A | 21,238 | 37,7 | 16,13 | 13,665 | 7,573 | 280 | 74,50% | 100% | |
B | 58,263 | 45,2 | 26,03 | 35,653 | 22,610 | 305 | 85,70% | 100% | |||