Skip to main content

Xerochrysium gen. nov. and Bettsia, genera encompassing xerophilic species of Chrysosporium


On the basis of a study of ITS sequences, Vidal et al. (Rev. Iber. Micol. 17: 22, 2000) recommended that the genus Chrysosporium be restricted to species belonging to Onygenales. Using nrLSU genes, we studied the majority of clades examined by Vidal et al. and showed that currently accepted species in Chrysosporium phylogenetically belong in six clades in three orders. Surprisingly, the xerophilic species of Chrysosporium, long thought to be a single grouping away from the majority of Chrysosporium species, occupy two clades, one in Leotiales, the other in Eurotiales. Species accepted in Leotiales are related to the sexual genus Bettsia. One is the type species B. alvei, and related asexual strains classified as C. farinicola, the second is C. fastidium transferred to Bettsia as B. fastidia. Species in the Eurotiales are transferred to Xerochrysium gen. nov., where the accepted species are X. xerophilum and X. dermatitidis, the correct name for C. inops on transfer to Xerochrysium. All accepted species are extreme xerophiles, found in dried and concentrated foods.


The genus Chrysosporium was revived by Carmichael (1962) as a way to rationalise the taxonomy of a number of genera of hyphomycetes characterised by the production of aleurioconidia “on undifferentiated hyphae either at the tip, along the sides, or in an intercalary position.” The aleurioconidia “were released by the disintegration of part, or all, of the spore-bearing mycelium” (Carmichael 1962). Although “aleurioconidium” is considered to be an obsolete term, it remains the most precise available for thick-walled conidia produced on pedicels along a stipe, seceding only with difficulty. Many of the species included in Chrysosporium by Carmichael were of medical importance, being dermatophytic or keratinolytic or both. However, one new species described by Carmichael, C. inops, was isolated from orange concentrate, so was likely to be xerophilic. Some species, including C. inops, also produce thick-walled intrahyphal conidia, both swollen cells (chlamydoconidia) and unswollen cells (arthroconidia), which intergrade (Carmichael 1962, Barron 1968).

Pitt (1966) described two new species of Chrysosporium, C. fastidium and C. xerophilum, from dried fruit: both appeared to be related to C. inops. These species were subsequently shown to be among the most xerophilic organisms known, capable of growth below 0.7 water activity (aw) (Pitt & Christian 1968, Pitt 1975). In the following years, it was considered that Carmichael’s concept of Chrysosporium was too broad: some genera including Sporothrix, Sporotrichum, and Geomyces were separated out again. Sporothrix is a medically important dermatophyte (de Hoog et al. 2000), Sporotrichum has been restricted to the asexual states of some lignicolous basidiomycetes (Stalpers 1984), and Geomyces is a genus of saprophytes (Barron 1968) and also includes a xerophilic species (Hocking & Pitt 1988).

Van Oorschot (1980) monographed Chrysosporium, retained Carmichael’s concept of the genus, and accepted 22 species. However, the medium used in descriptions by van Oorschot (1980) was a cherry decoction agar, of unspecified but undoubtedly quite high aw, so that growth of the xerophilic species was far from optimal. The basic circumscription of Chrysosporium still included most hyphomycete fungi that produce aleurioconidia.Skou (1972) described a new sexual genus, Bettsia. This includes a single species, B. alvei, which produces a xerophilic Chrysosporium asexual morph, C. farinicola (Skou 1975). Bettsia alvei produces small, dark, distinctive cleistothecia, different from sexual morphs related to other Chrysosporium species. Skou (1992) described several newxerophilic species and varieties of Chrysosporium from mason bees (Osmia spp.) and beehives.

Using ribosomal ITS sequence data, Vidal et al. (2000) divided Chrysosporium into nine species groups and concluded that this genus should be restricted to asexual species in Onygenales that possess keratinophilic but not cellulolytic capabilities.

Our study of the extremely xerophilic ascomycete Xeromyces bisporus indicated a close relatedness to the xerophilic Chrysosporium species C. xerophilum and C. inops. Phylogenetic analysis of the 28S rRNA gene securely placed these species within Eurotiales, as strictly asexual species (Pettersson et al. 2011). Chrysosporium xerophilum is capable of more rapid growth over a wider aw range than C. inops (Leong et al. 2011).

This paper reports a critical assessment of the xerophilic species currently classified in Chrysosporium, i.e. C. fastidium, C. farinicola, C. inops, and C. xerophilum, together with the seven species described by Skou (1992).

Materials and Methods

Cultural studies

Culture conditions

The xerophilic species studied grow very poorly, if at all, on conventional media such as Czapek yeast extract agar (CYA) or malt extract agar (MEA; Pitt & Hocking 2009). Optimal growth occurs on very concentrated media, such as malt extract yeast extract 50 % glucose agar (MY50G, 0.89 aw). Taxonomic descriptions are therefore based on growth on that medium (Pitt & Hocking 2009). Plates were three-point inoculated with a needle-point of dry spores, and incubated at 25 °C for 7 d, colonies were measured, and plates were then reincubated for a further 7 d. Microscopical observations were made at both times.

Growth and morphology of cultures at 25 °C were also examined on G25N and Casein Czapek 50G agar after 14 d, the latter previously used for differentiating foodborne Chrysosporium species (Kinderlerer 1995).

Effect of water activity and temperature on growth rate

Agar media based on MY50G were prepared at 0.99, 0.89, 0.78, 0.73 and 0.71 aw. At the two lowest water activities, glucose and fructose were mixed in equal amounts. The water activities of the media were monitored at the beginning and end of the trial using the dew point technique in the AquaLab CX-2 (Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA). Mycelial suspensions were prepared in sterile 50 % glycerol from cultures grown on MY50G at 25 °C for 3 wk. Triplicate plates were single point inoculated with 5 µL mycelial suspension and incubated at 20, 25, 30 and 37 °C for 50 d. Plates were wrapped in polyethylene film (household cling film) to prevent evaporation and placed in double zip-lock polyethylene bags in stacks no higher than six plates tall. To calculate the linear growth rate of the strains, colony diameters were measured on two perpendicular axes regularly at appropriate intervals, and the mean diameters recorded.

Molecular studies

Sequences used

The phylogenetic relationships of the species studied were assessed by analysis of 28S rRNA sequences, including representative species from the majority of clades described by Vidal et al. (2000). Ex-type strains were used where available, obtained from CBS (KNAW-CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht), and FRR (CSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, North Ryde, NSW). Additional sequences were also downloaded from GenBank based on two principles. First, conserved regions of nrLSU were extracted from Chrysosporium species representing each strongly supported clade in Vidal et al. (2000) and used to find similar sequences in GenBank with BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990). Second, to be able to place the xerophilic Chrysosporium species to order and class, a wide sample of species representing most ascomycete orders and classes was included. Accession numbers for these additional sequences are noted in the TreeBASE file (see Results, Phylogenetic analysis).


For DNA extraction, nonxerophilic strains were grown on MEA and xerophilic strains on MY50G at 25 °C for 2 wk. Fresh mycelia were harvested by scraping colony surfaces into Eppendorf tubes containing 200 mM TRIS pH 8.5, 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA pH 8.0 and 1 % SDS. Mycelia were then mechanically sheared using a VWR pestle-homogeniser (Argos Technologies, Elgin, IL). An equal volume of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added, after which tubes were centrifuged at 13 000 g, for 20 min at 4 °C. The aqueous phase was collected and DNA precipitated by adding an equal volume of ice cold isopropanol, followed by 10 min incubation at −20 °C. The pellets were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 g, washed with 95 % ethanol, dried, dissolved in Tris EDTA buffer and quantified by NanoVue machine (GE Lifesciences, Uppsala).

PCR was performed with primers 5.8SR and LR6 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990) using Phusion High Fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Helsinki) under conditions recommended by the manufacturer.

Before sequencing, the amplified fragments were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification kit (QiaGen, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing reactions were performed at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) using primers LR3 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990) and LR0R (Vilgalys, unpubl.) in addition to 5.8SR and LR6 also used in the prior PCR amplification. Geneious Pro v. 5 (Drummond et al. 2010) was used for assembly of chromatograms and for multiple alignments using the MAFFT plugin (Katoh et al. 2002) with manual editing and optimisation of obtained alignments performed when necessary. Ambiguously aligned parts were identified by visual inspection of the alignments in Geneious and excluded from the analyses using an Exclude statement when running MrBayes. Unique sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1 List of Chrysosporium and related species examined.

Phylogenetic analyses

The aligned matrices were subjected to Bayesian analyses using MrBayes v. 3.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003).

To identify the most suitable substitution model for the Bayesian analyses, we used MrModeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004), utilizing the Akaike Information Criterion. The analysis was performed with two sets of four chains (one cold and three heated) and the Stoprule option, stopping the analyses at an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.01. The sample frequency was set to 100; the first 25 % of trees were removed as burn in.

Matrices and the resultant tree are available in TreeBASE, as accession number 14206.


The striking result of the broadly based LSU analysis is that the genus Chrysosporium as revived by Carmichael (1962) and maintained by van Oorschot (1980) includes six clades in three orders (Fig. 1). The type species of the genus is C. corii, the correct name for which is C. merdarium, but no cultures derived from the extant type material of these two names could be located. The LSU sequence examined was from CBS 388.68, derived from the type of C. merdarium var. roseum. That occupied an isolated position in Leotiales close to Geomyces pannorum and Pseudogymnoascus roseus, well separated from other species. Vidal et al. (2000) examined the ITS sequence from CBS 408.72, listed by CBS as C. merdarium, but also stated to be derived from the type of Gymnoascus uncinatus. Not surprisingly, that is located in Onygenales. However, the epitypification of the type species of Chrysosporium is beyond the scope of this paper. The Chrysoporium spp. not isolated from dried foods or bees were all incapable of growth on MY50G agar, and again outside our scope.

Fig. 1

Phylogeny based on 28S sequences of Chrysosporium species including xerophilic species isolated from foods or bee pollen. Classification according to Lumbsch & Huhndorf (2010) in brackets. Leotiomycetes is supported in two clades and includes taxa noted by to have uncertain taxonomic affinity. Two strains, J211 and FRR 81, were originally identified as C. fastidium, but upon examination their morphology was that of C. farinicola.

Of immediate relevance, however, the LSU indicated that the xerophilic species associated with food or bees are also polyphyletic, belonging to two clades, one in Eurotiales, where most xerophilic fungi belong, and the other in Leotiales.

Morphological and physiological characteristics support this separation: the seven species in the Leotiales clade viz. C. farinicola, C. fastidium, C. hispanicum, C. holmii, C. medium, C. minor, and C. pyriformis, have a distinctly different proportion of the conidial types characteristic of the xerophilic Chrysosporium species, and generally have a somewhat faster radial growth rate on MY50G-based media at 20–30 °C than those species grouped in Eurotiales (C. botryoides, C. globiferum, C. inops, and C. xerophilum; Table 2). Species in the Leotiales clade did not grow at 37 °C, but had an optimum temperature around 25 °C; growth rates at 0.89 aw and 20 °C were only somewhat slower than at 25 °C and similar to those at 30 °C. Thus, this group appears to be tolerant of cooler temperatures: in contrast, species in the Eurotiales clade displayed a preference for warmer temperatures with most rapid growth typically at 30 °C and slower growth at 20 °C. All species apart from C. inops were capable of growth at 37 °C. In addition to a broader temperature range, these species also showed a somewhat greater tolerance of high and low water activities: most species showed linear growth or at least germination within the range 0.99–0.71 aw at 25–30°C. Such growth at extremes of water activity was sporadically observed among species in the Leotiales clade: within 50 d, germination, but not linear growth, was noted at 0.73–0.71 aw for certain species only and growth at 0.99 aw was only observed at 20 °C. Species from the two clades also differed greatly during growth on Czapek Casein 50G agar (Table 3). Species belonging to Eurotiales yielded dense, white, slightly floccose colonies with reverse colours in cream/pale apricot to yellow/khaki, and colony diameters > 40 mm within 14 d (18 mm for C. inops); whereas, species within Leotiales yielded sparse, hyaline colonies with little aerial mycelium, 8–26 mm diam.

Table 2 Radial growth rate (mm/d) of xerophilic Chrysosporium species on malt yeast media with water activity adjusted with glucose or a mixture of glucose and fructose at 37, 30, 25 and 20 °C.

The xerophilic species in the Leotiales clade include C. farinicola, the asexual morph of Bettsia alvei. Based on sequence identity and a striking number of physiological and morphological similarities in the asexual morph, the xerophilic species in the Leotiales clade, apart from C. fastidium, are placed in synonymy, regardless of presence/absence of sexual morph. Under the new Code (McNeill et al. 2012), the strictly asexual Chrysosporium species in Leotiales should be renamed in Bettsia, the oldest available generic name. The correct epithet is B. alvei, as its basionym Pericystis alvei dates from 1912, while the basionym of C. farinicola, Ovularia farinicola, was introduced in 1928 (Skou 1975, van Oorschot 1980). Retention of C. fastidium as a separate species, B. fastidia, is warranted based on the distinct yellow-brown colours of the mycelium, somewhat slower growth rate on MY50G, and its placement as a sister clade to B. alvei (Fig. 1).

The xerophilic Chrysosporium species grouped together in Eurotiales are all asexual morphs. In the absence of any available name, the new generic name Xerochrysium is given to them here. The LSU tree indicated that C. inops is distinct, but other species were not separated satisfactorily (Fig. 1). Based on similarities in morphology, physiology and molecular data, the remaining species are synonymised under the oldest name, C. xerophilum.

The genus most closely related to Xerochrysium is Xeromyces (Fig. 1), which contains one species, the extreme xerophile X. bisporus. Xeromyces is distinguished from Xerochrysium because it is primarily a sexual genus, in which fresh isolates readily produce characteristic asci containing two D-shaped ascospores; unlike Xerochrysium, it does not produce chlamydo- or aleurioconidia, instead producing a rare Frasierella asexual morph.


Although molecular analyses have shown that species in Bettsia and species now placed in the new genus Xerochrysium are widely separated phylogenetically, striking similarities exist in microscopic appearance. However, in culture these two groups of species are not difficult to separate. Growth rates of Bettsia species are faster than those of Xerochrysium species, although some overlap exists (Table 3). The other major distinguishing feature is the proportion of aleurioconidia to chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia: Bettsia species produce predominantly aleurioconidia whereas Xerochrysium species produce predominantly chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia (see Figs 25).

Table 3 Distinguishing features of species in Bettsia and Xerochrysium.
Fig. 2

Bettsia alvei. A. Colonies of a strictly asexual strain, FRR 2000, on MY50G, after 14 d at 25 °C. B. Colonies of a sexually reproducing strain, FRR 380, on MY50G, after 14 d at 25 °C. C. Aleurioconidia. D. FRR 380, mature cleistothecia containing ascospores. E. Ascospores. Bars: C = 10 µm, D = 25 urn, and E = 5 µm.

Fig. 3

Bettsia fastidia (FRR 77). A–B. Obverse and reverse of colonies on MY50G, after 14 d at 25 °C. C–D. Aleurioconidia borne on pedicels. Bars = 10 µm.

Fig. 4

Xerochrysium dermatitidis (FRR 2353). A. Colonies on MY50G, after 14 d at 25 °C. B–D. Chains of arthroconidia borne by hyphal transformation. Bars: B–C = 10 um, D = 20 µm.

Fig. 5

Xerochrysium xerophilum (FRR 503). A. Colonies on MY50G, after 14 d at 25 °C. B–C. Chains of arthroconidia borne by hyphal transformation. Bars = 10 µm.


Bettsia is characterised by the formation of small black cleistothecia with a distinctive three-celled appendage. Asci are evanescent, and ascospores have smooth, dark walls. The type and only species is a hyphomycete asexual morph, with aerial hyphae bearing solitary aleurioconidia and intercalary chlamydoconidia.

Skou (1972) erected the genus Bettsia as a new name for Pericystis Betts 1912 (non Pericystis J. Agardh 1848). The type species is B. alvei. Molecular analysis (LSU) indicates that Bettsia lies in Leotiales, with a possible relationship to the genus Pseudeurotium.

One other species with no known sexual morph is accepted here: B. fastidia.

Bettsia alvei (Betts) Skou, Friesia 10: 7 (1972).

(Fig. 2)

Basionym: Pericystis alvei Betts, Ann. Botan. 26: 795 (1912).

Synonyms: Ascosphaera alvei (Betts) Olive & Spiltoir, Mycologia 47: 243 (1955).

Ovularia farinicola Burnside, Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts Lett. 8: 59 (1928).

Chrysosporium farinicola (Burnside) Skou, Friesia 11: 70 (1972).

Chrysosporium hispanicum Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 244 (1992).

Chrysosporium holmii Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 243 (1992).

Chrysosporium medium Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 248 (1992).

Chrysosporium medium var. spissescens Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 249 (1992).

Chrysosporium minus Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 250 (1992); as “minor”.

Chrysosporium pyriforme Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 246 (1992); as “pyriformis”.

Description: No growth on CYA at 5, 25 or 37 °C or on MEA at 25 °C. Colonies on G25N 1–20 mm diam, of low, white mycelium, or if the sexual morph is present, centrally grey from the production of immature cleistothecia; margins fimbriate; reverse pale, but grey centrally if the sexual morph is produced. Colonies on MY50G growing relatively rapidly at 7 d, 15–35 mm diam, low, plane, persistently white, or showing sectors becoming translucent or greyish if the sexual morph is present, reverse pale beneath white areas, but darker beneath grey sectors; at 14 d, 40–65 mm diam, colonies remaining white if only the asexual morph is present, but dark grey to black in the presence of the sexual morph; reverse pale or dark.

Reproduction on MY50G predominantly solitary aleurioconidia. Fertile hyphae remain mostly undifferentiated and dissolve in age. In isolates producing the sexual morph areas or sectors of translucent growth develop on MY50G.

At maturity such areas become grey and then black as small cleistothecia form. Cleistothecia formed on MY50G at 25 °C, dark brown to black, usually maturing only after several weeks at 15–25 °C, 25–60 µm diam, with walls thin and smooth, and without internal structure; initials a row of three short cells, 12–18 × 6–8 µm overall, adhering to the cleistothecial wall as a distinctive appendage; ascospores not liberated readily, spherical, 5–6 µm diam, with dark walls, smooth to minutely roughened.

Type: Denmark: Zeeland: Ringsted, Skee, a lyophilised culture, from pollen in honeycomb, 1971, J. P. Skou (CBS 688.71 — neotype designated by Skou 1972; IMI 160840 — ex-neotype culture).

Distinctive features: Bettsia alvei is distinguished from B. fastidia by persistently white growth in the absence of the sexual morph. In addition, while only some isolates of B. alvei produce the sexual morph, no sexual morph is known for B. fastidia.

Physiology: Optimal growth at approx. 0.89 aw and 25 °C. No growth at 37 °C, good growth at 20 °C. Growth at 0.99 aw observed at 20 °C only; minimum aw estimated to be approx. 0.70–0.73 based on germination of certain strains at 0.71 aw.

Ecology: Bettsia alvei, often under the name Chrysosporium farinicola, has been isolated from a range of low water activity substrates, including honeycomb, prunes and prune processing equipment, sultanas, mixed dried fruit, chocolate, jelly crystals and coconut from Australia, the United Kingdom, Sri Lanka, Czechoslovakia and Denmark (Pitt & Hocking 2009).

References: Skou (1975), and van Oorschot (1980).

Bettsia fastidia (Pitt) Pitt, comb. nov.

MycoBank MB806122

(Fig. 3)

Basionym: Chrysosporium fastidium Pitt, Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 49: 467 (1966).

Description: No growth on CYA at 5, 25 or 37 °C, or on MEA. Colonies on G25N 1–5 mm diam, of low, dense, white mycelium. Colonies on MY50G at 7 d 15–22 mm diam, low, plane and sparse, pale yellow or brown, reverse yellow brown; at 14 d, 35–42 mm diam, low and plane, margins sparse and fimbriate, white, centres more dense, dull yellow; reverse yellow to pale brown.

Reproduction on MY50G predominantly by smooth walled aleurioconidia borne singly on short pedicels or less commonly sessile, spheroidal (oblate or prolate) to broadly ellipsoidal, 6–9 × 5–8 µm, in age released by dissolution of the pedicels; terminal chlamydoconidia, spherical to pyriform or pedunculate, 8–12 × 6–10 µm, also produced, but intercalary chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia rare. No sexual morph known.

Type: Australia: New South Wales: a dried Petri dish culture, from dried prunes, 1964, J. I. Pitt (UAMH 2368 — holotype; FRR 77, CBS 154.67, ATCC 18053, ATCC 36783, and IMI 126288 — ex-holotype cultures).

Distinctive features: Bettsia fastidia forms dull yellow to yellow-brown colonies; conidia produced on G25N or MY50G are predominantly aleurioconidia with few intercalary chlamydoconidia or arthroconidia. This species is readily distinguished from B. alvei, as the latter species show no yellow or brown colouration, and by slower growth than B. alvei on MY50G.

Taxonomy: Van Oorschot (1980) considered C. fastidium a synonym of C. farinicola. However, our examination of the strain she examined, FRR 77 (CBS 154.67), showed that that culture was incorrectly labelled. The two species are readily distinguished by colony colour and by LSU sequence.

Physiology: A mesophilic obligate xerophile, B. fastidia has a minimum for growth of 0.69 aw (Pitt & Christian 1968), and displays optimal growth at approx. 0.89 aw and 25 °C. No growth at 37 °C, good growth at 20 °C. Growth at 0.99 aw observed at 20 °C only.

Ecology: This species has been repeatedly isolated from prunes (dried and high moisture) and prune processing machinery in New South Wales, Australia. There are no records of isolation from other substrates or other countries, indicating that this is a rare species with a restricted habitat.

Xerochrysium Pitt, gen. nov.

MycoBank MB807003

Type species: Xerochrysium dermatitidis (A. Agostini) Pitt 2013 (syn. Glenosporella dermatitidis A. Agostini 1930).

Description: Xerochrysium is a genus of Eurotiales known only as asexual morphs which is erected to accommodate xerophilic species formerly placed in Chrysosporium. The known species grow poorly, if at all, on standard media including CYA, MEA and potato dextrose agar. Growth is slow on G25N. Optimal growth is obtained on MY50G, with a water activity below 0.9. Microscopically species are characterised by the production of aleurioconidia, but also by the formation of chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia, such that mature colonies are often made up predominantly of these spore types, with little undifferentiated mycelium evident.

Two species are accepted here: X. dermatitidis and X. xerophilum.

Xerochrysium dermatitidis (A. Agostini) Pitt, comb. nov.

MycoBank MB807005

(Fig. 4)

Basionym: Glenosporella dermatitidis A. Agostini, Atti Ist. Bot. Univ. Pavia 2: 93 (1930).

Synonym: Chrysosporium inops J.W. Carmich., Can. J. Bot. 40: 1156 (1962).

Description: After 7 d at 25 °C, colonies on CYA and MEA absent or up to 3 mm diam. Colonies on G25N 1–9 mm diam, varying from low and translucent to deep and floccose, white; reverse pale to amber or duller yellow brown. No growth on CYA at 5 or 37 °C. Colonies on MY50G at 7 d, 4–10 mm diam, at 14 d, 12–20 mm diam, varying from low, sparse and translucent to moderately deep, dense and with a floccose surface, white or if translucent, uncoloured; reverse uncoloured to pale yellow brown.

Reproductive structures on G25N or MY50G at 7 d primarily short chains of chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia, borne by retrogressive differentiation from hyphal tips and as intercalary chains; some terminal chlamydoconidia also present; at maturity on MY50G (2–4 wk), clusters of chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia also present, formed by retrogressive differentiation of groups of short branching hyphae with a lateral stipe as their common origin. Chlamydoconidia spherical, 4–7(–10) µm diam; arthroconidia cylindroidal ordoliiform (barrel shaped), 3–8 × 3–6 µm, those of greater width intergrading with chlamydoconidia; aleurioconidia uncommon, ellipsoidal to pyriform, 5–8 µm diam or longer. Large chlamydoconidia, up to 25 µm diam, with walls up to 2 µm thick, produced by some isolates. Sexual morph unknown.

Type: Italy: Pavia: Pavia, lyophilised culture obtained from human skin, 1930, A. Agostini (CBS 132.31 — lectotype designated here; IMI 96729, UAMH 802, and FRR 2376 — ex-lectotype cultures).

Nomenclature: Based on CBS 132.31, received as Glenosporella dermatitidis, Carmichael (1962) transferred this species to Chrysosporium. However, as he had already used the epithet “dermatitidis” in C. dermatitidis, he transferred G. dermatitidis as C. inops nom. nov. On transfer to the new genus Xerochrysium, this epithet is again available, so the new combination is correctly X. dermatitidis.

Distinctive features: In culture, Xerochrysium dermatitidis and X. xerophilum are very similar: X. dermatitidis grows more slowly on standard media and on CZC50G (Table 3). In young colonies (7 d), terminal chlamydoconidia are often the dominant conidium type in X. dermatitidis. Aleurioconidia are rare.

Physiology: Van Oorschot (1980) reported that this species had a minimum growth temperature of 20 °C, an optimum of 25 °C, and a maximum of 30 °C. However, her data were obtained on media of very high aw, and limits are undoubtedly wider under optimal conditions. No growth at 37 °C, and maximum growth at approx. 0.88 aw and 25 °C (Leong et al. 2011). Maximum aw for growth is 0.99 and minimum aw < 0.71, as germination was observed at 0.71 aw and 30 °C (Table 2). It is clear, contrary to previous reports (Pitt & Christian 1968, van Oorschot 1980), that X. dermatitidis is an extreme xerophile.

Ecology: As noted by de Hoog et al. (2000), X. dermatitidis is not a dermatophyte, but a xerophile. With the exception of the original isolation by Agostini (1930) from human skin, all isolates known have come from dried or concentrated foods. Sources have included spice powders, chopped dates, gelatine confections, chocolate and nuts (Pitt & Hocking 2009).

Xerochrysium xerophilum (Pitt) Pitt, comb. nov.

MycoBank MB807006

(Fig. 5)

Basionym: Chrysosporium xerophilum Pitt, Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 49: 468 (1966).

Synonyms: Chrysosporium botryoides Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 252 (1992).

Chrysosporium globiferum Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 253 (1992).

Chrysosporium globiferum var. articulatum Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 254 (1992).

Chrysosporium globiferum var. niveum Skou, Mycotaxon 43: 255 (1992).

Description: After 7 d at 25 °C, colonies on CYA and MEA absent or up to 3 mm diam. Colonies on G25N 1–9 mm diam, varying from low and translucent to deep and floccose, white; reverse pale. No growth on CYA at 5 or 37 °C. Colonies on MY50G at 7 d 9–20 mm diam, at 14 d, 20–38 mm diam, varying from low, sparse and translucent to moderately deep, dense and with a floccose surface, white or if translucent, uncoloured; reverse uncoloured to yellow-apricot, khaki.

Vegetative hyphae rare in mature colonies on G25N or MY50G, having transformed into chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia; chlamydoconidia spherical, 6–9 µm diam, arthroconidia 4–5 × 3–9 µm (width sometimes exceeding length), the two spore types intergrading. Aleurioconidia borne on hyphal tips or laterally on short pedicels, often subsequently tranformed into arthroconidia as well, cylindroidal or doliiform. Terminal conidia 10–11 µm diam, on pedicels smaller, ellipsoidal to pyriform, 5–7 × 7–8 µm.

Type: Australia: New South Wales: Sydney, a dried Petri dish culture, from spoiled high moisture prunes, 1962, J.I. Pitt (UAMH 2368 — holotype; CBS 153.67, FRR 503, ATCC 18053, and IMI 126287 — ex-holotype cultures).

Distinctive features: Xerochrysium xerophilum grows more rapidly than X. dermatitidis (Table 3). In addition, Xerochrysium xerophilum produces higher numbers of aleurioconidia and at maturity, is distinguished by the almost complete differentiation of vegetative hyphae into intercalary chlamydoconidia and arthroconidia; even aleurioconidium pedicels often becoming thick-walled spores.

Taxonomy: Based on a morphological study, Boekhout et al. (1989) concluded that Chrysosporium xerophilum was a synonym of Sporotrichum pruinosum. However, as they reported that their strain grew well on such high water activity media as 2 % MEA and phytone yeast extract agar, and that its optimal growth temperature was 36–39 °C, completely at odds with the original description (Pitt 1965), it is clear that the strain they studied was incorrectly identified.

Physiology: Xerochrysium xerophilum grows over a broad range of aw, with maximum and minimum aw for growth of approx. 0.99 and 0.66, respectively, and optimum around 0.94 (Table 2, Leong et al. 2011). Optimum temperature for growth is 30–37 °C, and growth occurs at 20 °C.

Ecology: Originally isolated from prunes, X. xerophilum has also been found in maize stored for long periods, chocolate and coconut (Pitt & Hocking 2009).


The result of the broadly based LSU analysis, that Chrysosporium as currently circumscribed includes six clades in three orders, is perhaps not surprising, as the basic asexual morph structure on which the genus is based, the aleurioconidium, is a simple conidial form that could readily have arisen more than once. More surprising is that the xerophilic species belong to two clades, in radically different orders. For a long time it was believed that xerophily, a highly evolved characteristic involving the many genes required to synthesise and retain small molecules such as glycerol, and operate all cellular processes in a more or less thick syrup, had arisen only once, and that all xerophilic species could be found in Eurotiales (or ascomycetous yeasts from a lineage close to Eurotiales). A very small number of exceptions have been identified in relatively recent years: Trichosporonoides nigrescens (Hocking & Pitt 1981) produces clamp connections, indicating a basidiomycetous affinity, while the isolated genus Wallemia has also been shown to be a basidiomycete by molecular methods and microscopy (Zalar et al. 2005, Padamsee et al. 2012). However, no species in Leotiales has previously been shown to have xerophilic properties.

The ecology of these species is also of interest. Carmichael (1962) described the first xerophilic species to be placed in Chrysosporium, C. inops, from concentrated orange juice, and C. xerophilum and C. fastidium were described from prunes (dried plums) soon afterwards (Pitt 1966). When recombining Ovularia farinicola into Chrysosporium, Skou (1975) drew attention to the main natural source of these fungi, beehives, bee pollen and honey. At the same time, it is clear that some of these species are also common food spoilage fungi: Xerochrysium dermatitidis (as C. inops), X. xerophilum, and B. alvei have been repeatedly isolated from concentrated or dried foods. Bettsia alvei has been recorded from honeycomb, prunes and processing equipment, dried vine fruits, chocolate, and copra, from several widely separated countries, and X. dermatitidis and X. xerophilum are also known to be widespread in similar types of products, sometimes causing spoilage. Although repeatedly isolated in Australia from prunes and prune processing equipment, B. fastidia has not been found elsewhere (Pitt & Hocking 2009). Despite the narrow ecological niche of B. fastidia, all of these species, as well as the extreme xerophile Xeromyces bisporus, are associated with food or feed, and require highly concentrated media such as MY50G for effective isolation (Pitt & Hocking 2009). As their colonies on this medium are somewhat similar in appearance, being pale to white and low, a common key to species in these three genera is given below.

Key to xerophilic fungi in the genera Bettsia, Xerochrysium, and Xeromyces

  1. 1

    Colonies on MY50G producing D-shaped ascospores in pairs ........................................................................... Xeromyces bisporus

    Colonies on MY50G not producing D-shaped ascospores; instead aleurioconidia and/or chlamydoconidia observed ..................... 2

  2. 2 (1)

    Colonies on MY50G 35–65 mm after 14 d at 25 °C; colony and reverse white, yellow-brown, or black; aleurioconidia abundant, chlamydoconidia rare. No growth at 37 °C. Growth on CZC50G poor, yielding sparse, hyaline colonies ................................................................................................................................ 3

    Colonies on MY50G 12–38 mm after 14 d at 25 °C; colony and reverse white; chlamydoconidia and/or arthroconidia abundant, aleurioconidia occasionally present. Growth at 37 °C present or absent. Colonies on CZC50G dense, white; reverse in yellow-khaki shades, occasionally red ..................................................... 4

  3. 3 (2)

    Colonies on MY50G 40–65 mm after 14 d, white or black, reverse pale or black ........................................................... Bettsia alvei

    Colonies on MY50G 35–42 mm after 14 d, pale yellow or brown with a yellow brown reverse ............................... Bettsia fastidia

  4. 4 (2)

    Growth on MY50G typically 15 mm or less after 14 d (up to 20 mm); no growth at 37 °C .................. Xerochrysium dermatitidis

    Growth on MY50G 20–38 mm after 14 d; growth at 37 °C .................................................................... Xerochrysium xerophilum


  1. Agostini A (1930) Glenosporella dermatitidis n. sp. causa di dermatomicosi umana. Atti dell’Istituto Botanico della Università e Laboratorio Crittogamico di Pavia 2: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barron GW (1968) The Genera of Hyphomycetes from Soil. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boekhout T, van Oorschot CAN, Stalpers JA, Batenberg-van de Vegte WH, Weijman ACM (1989) The taxonomic position of Chrysosporium xerophilum and septal morphology in Chrysosporium, Sporotrichum and Disporotrichum. Studies in Mycology 31: 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmichael, JW (1962) Chrysosporium and some other aleuriosporic Hyphomycetes. Canadian Journal of Botany 40: 1137–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ (2000) Atlas of Clinical Fungi. 2nd edn. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2010) Geneious v5.3. Available from

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hocking AD, Pitt JI (1981) Trichosporonoides nigrescens sp. nov., a new xerophilic yeast-like fungus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 47: 411–421.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hocking AD, Pitt JI (1988) Two new species of xerophilic fungi and a further record of Eurotium halophilicum. Mycologia 80: 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinderlerer JL (1995) Czapek Casein 50 % Glucose (CZC50G): a new medium for the identification of foodborne Chrysosporium spp. Letters in Applied Microbiology 21: 131–136.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transformation. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3059–3066.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leong SL, Vinnere Pettersson O, Rice T, Hocking AD, Schnürer J (2011) The extreme xerophilic mould Xeromyces bisporus — growth and competition at various water activities. International Journal of Food Microbiology 145: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SH (2010) Myconet Volume 14. Fieldiana, Life and Earth Sciences 1: 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck RW, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Smith GF, Weirsema JH, Turland NJ (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants. [Regnum Vegetabile no. 154.] Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nylander JAA (2004) MRMODELTEST v2. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre. Program distributed by the author.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Padamsee M, Kumar TKA, Riley R, Binder M, Boyd A, Calvo AM, Furukawa K, Hesse C, Hohmann S, James TY, LaButti K, Lapidus A, Lindquist E, Lucas S, Miller K, Shantappa S, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS, McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW, Aime MC (2012) The genome of the xerotolerant mold Wallemia sebi reveals adaptations to osmotic stress and suggests cryptic sexual reproduction. Fungal Genetics and Biology 49: 217–226.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pettersson OV, Leong SL, Lantz H, Rice T, Dijksterhuis J, Houbraken J, Samson RA, Schnürer J (2011) Phylogeny and intraspecific variation of the extreme xerophile, Xeromyces bisporus. Fungal Biology 115: 1100–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitt JI (1966) Two new species of Chrysosporium. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 49: 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitt, JI (1973) An appraisal of identification methods for Penicillium species: novel taxonomic criteria based on temperature and water relations. Mycologia 65: 1135–1157.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitt JI (1975) Xerophilic fungi and the spoilage of foods of plant origin. In: Water Relations of Foods (RB Duckworth, ed.): 273–307. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pitt JI, Christian JHB (1968) Water relations of xerophilic fungi isolated from prunes. Applied Microbiology 16: 1853–1858.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pitt JI, Hocking AD (2009) Fungi and Food Spoilage. 3rd edn. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Skou JP (1972) Ascosphaeriales. Freisia 10: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Skou JP (1975) Two new species of Ascosphaera and notes on the conidial state of Bettsia alvei. Freisia 11: 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skou JP (1992) A series of xerophilic Chrysosporium species. Mycotaxon 43: 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stalpers JA (1980) A revision of the genus Sporotrichum. Studies in Mycology 24: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Oorschot CAN (1980) A revision of Chrysosporium and allied genera. Studies in Mycology 20: 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vidal P, Vinuesa MDLA, Sánchez-Puelles JM, Guarro J (2000) Phylogeny of the anamorphic genus Chrysosporium and related taxa based on rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia 17: 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zalar P, de Hoog GS, Schroers HJ, Frank JM, Gunde-Cimerman N (2005) Taxonomy and phylogeny of the xerophilic genus Wallemia (Wallemiomycetes and Wallemiales, cl. et ord. nov.). Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 87: 311–328.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the Faculty of Science and Agriculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the Carl-Tryggers Foundation (grant CTS 09: 347), and FORMAS (The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, grant 2010-1470). We thank Ellinor Andersson for technical assistance, Robert A. Samson for generously providing some cultures, and he and Johan Schnürer for fruitful discussions. We are also grateful for sequences made available in the AFTOL project (Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to John I. Pitt.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitt, J.I., Lantz, H., Vinnere Pettersson, O. et al. Xerochrysium gen. nov. and Bettsia, genera encompassing xerophilic species of Chrysosporium. IMA Fungus 4, 229–241 (2013).

Download citation

Key words

  • Eurotiales
  • food spoilage
  • Leotiales
  • molecular systematics
  • Onygenales
  • Taxonomy