Skip to main content

Advertisement

Addressing the diversity of Xylodon raduloides complex through integrative taxonomy

Article metrics

Abstract

In this study, the taxonomic diversity of the Xylodon raduloides species complex (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) is examined. Specimens were studied using an integrative taxonomic approach that includes molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses, and environmental niche comparisons. Four different species were found inside the Xylodon raduloides complex, with a biogeographic distribution pattern bound by geographic regions: Europe, North America, Patagonia, and Australia–New Zealand. Molecular, morphological, and environmental evidences delimit two lineages within this complex: a Northern Hemisphere clade with longer basidiospores and wider ranges in temperature and precipitation tolerance, and a Southern Hemisphere clade with smaller and more spherical basidiospores, and an isothermal and more humid climate preference. The integrative taxonomic approach used in this study demonstrates congruence between data sets and shows how morphological and environmental characteristics contribute to the differentiation of fungal species complexes. By combining various sources of taxonomic information, three new species are described: Xylodon laurentianus, X. novozelandicus, and X. patagonicus.

INTRODUCTION

Corticioid fungi represent a polyphyletic group delimited by effused and resupinate basidiomes that usually grow on dead wood. One descriptor for these fungi is “paint on wood” which accurately characterizes their thin crust of reproductive structures, which are among the most elementary in Agaricomycetes. Although traditional classification grouped these fungi in a single family, molecular phylogenetic analyses have identified up to 50 different families in at least 11 orders (Larsson 2007).

Studying the biodiversity of corticioid fungi presents an opportunity to explore their phylogeny. First, despite their apparent macromorphological homogeneity, according to Mueller et al. (2007), there are more than 1800 described species, making them a highly diverse group. Second, they have colonized a broad range of environments around the world (Hallenberg 1991). For these reasons, corticioid fungi offer unique opportunities to study speciation and the geographic patterns that result from this process.

The idea that fungi are free from dispersal barriers had a long tradition, so global distributions were accepted as normal (Lumbsch et al. 2008). Cosmopolitanism or a high similarity index in corticioid fungi distribution patterns have been reported in many studies (Gilbertson 1980, Ghobad-Nejhad 2011). However, molecular studies have demonstrated distinct biogeographic patterns related to hidden biodiversity (Taylor et al. 2006, Knight & Goddard 2015). In this context, the “everything is everywhere” hypothesis (Baas Becking 1934) for all fungal groups has given way to the argument that geographic range inferred for a fungal species strongly depends on the nature of the characters used for its delimitation (Taylor et al. 2000).

Species concepts in fungi remain an important discussion topic (Taylor et al. 2000, Öpik et al. 2016). The same species concept is not always applicable across all fungal taxa due to the multiple evolutionary processes that can lead to fungal speciation (e.g. horizontal gene transfer, hybridization, etc.; Giraud et al. 2008). During the last two decades, molecular tools have transformed the study of fungal biodiversity. Among all the regions tested in Schoch et al. (2012), the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer DNA region (ITS, the fungal barcode) in most cases has the highest resolving power for discrimination between closely related species. Even so, taxonomic/systematic studies benefit by including other genetic regions (Balasundaram et al. 2015). Fungal species concepts have evolved through time (Cai et al. 2011) and mycologists have benefited from the development of genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) for describing fungal diversity (Taylor et al. 2000). Molecular data have provided a detailed view of previously hidden fungal diversity, enabling better use of traditional species recognition methods in morphology or mating compatibility to unmask this cryptic fungal diversity (Giraud et al. 2008). The implementation of GCPSR has revealed the presence of hidden diversity in several complexes of corticioid fungi where morphological species recognition approaches failed (e.g. Serpula himantiodes, Carlsen et al. 2011). However, with the increase of DNA regions used to estimate phylogenies, many researchers have argued the need to consider processes that could lead to discordance among gene phylogenies, that is, differences between gene-trees and species-trees (Edwards 2009; Heled & Drummond 2010). The use of different models, such as the coalescent theory (Kingman 1982) that allows gene tree heterogeneity, have been successfully applied for fungal species delimitation (e.g. Hyphoderma paramacaronesicum, Martín et al. 2018).

The search for evidence in addition to molecular phylogenetic data has emerged as a goal for species delimitation (Wiens 2007). Interest has increased in ecological traits as characters for species identification in many organisms (Rissler & Apodaca 2007). The combination of phylogenetics and niche modeling methodologies has proven useful in studying the mechanisms that shape biogeographic patterns (Raxworthy et al. 2007, Marske et al. 2012). With the development of GIS-based and cartographic approaches, the comparison of environmental niches has been proposed to study such evolutionary processes as sympatric speciation and niche conservatism (Warren et al. 2008, Broennimann et al. 2012, Ahmadzadeh et al. 2013). Due to the paucity of detectable macromorphological features in corticioid fungi, identification and comparison of environmental diagnostic traits could help in revealing their hidden diversity.

Xylodon (Pers.) Gray 1821 is a cosmopolitan white-rot fungus (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota), with an important role in ecosystem services due to their ability to alter wood structure and create habitat for other groups of organisms. As noted by Hibbett et al. (2014), it is one of the largest genera of wood-rotting fungi, with 162 current legitimate names (Robert et al. 2005; Robert et al. 2013). During the last ten years, six new Xylodon species have been described (Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Chen et al. 2018, Crous et al. 2018, Viner et al. 2018), also 59 combinations made (Hjortstam & Ryvarden 2009, Riebesehl & Langer 2017, Chen et al. 2018) and two new names were proposed (Hjortstam & Ryvarden 2009, Riebesehl & Langer 2017).

Xylodon raduloides (Riebesehl & Langer 2017), previously known as Schizopora radula (Hallenberg 1983), has been widely reported. It is widespread in Europe, and the Canary Islands (Hallenberg 1983, 1991, Langer 1994, Ryvarden & Gilbertson 1994, Melo et al. 2007, Ryvarden & Melo 2014), and is also known from North America (Hallenberg 1983, Langer 1994, Zhou et al. 2016), South America (Langer 1994, Greslebin & Rajchenberg 2003, Gorjón & Hallenberg 2013, Martínez & Nakasone 2014), temperate Asia (Langer 1994, Hallenberg 1983), and Australasia (McKenzie et al. 2000, Paulus et al. 2000).

In a broad phylogenetic study of the genus Schizopora (now included in Xylodon), some degree of genetic isolation between populations of X. raduloides was detected, also supported by intercompatibility studies (Paulus et al. 2000). The worldwide geographic distribution of X. raduloides, along with available molecular data, suggested it could be a species complex with the true diversity reflecting biogeography. In this study, the diversity and biogeographic relationships in X. raduloides are addressed using an integrative taxonomic approach (Dayrat 2005). Our aim is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the taxonomic diversity of the complex through the use of multiple sources of evidence (multi-locus species coalescent phylogeny, morphological characters, and environmental equivalence analysis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Taxon sampling and morphological studies

A total of 39 vouchers of Xylodon raduloides (Table 1) were obtained from four fungaria (CFMR, MA-Fungi, NY, and PDD), cultures of the Forest Products Laboratory (USDA), and ICMP culture collection (World Data Center for Microorganism 2011). Specimens from Huinay (Los Lagos Region, Chile) were collected during fieldwork in 2013/2014. Specimens encompassed a broad geographic range (Europe, North America, Patagonia, and Australia–New Zealand regions), in order to better understand the internal diversity and biogeography of the X. raduloides complex.

Table 1 Specimens and sequences included in this study. Data of country and basidiospore size are shown if available. New sequences obtained in this study in bold

Colours of dried basidiomata follow the ISCC-NBS Centroid Color Charts (Kelly & Judd 1976). Measurements and drawings were made from microscopic sections mounted in 3% aqueous KOH and Congo Red solution and examined at magnifications up to 1250× using an Olympus BX51 microscope. The length (L) and width (W) of 20 spores and 10 basidia were measured from each specimen. Mean values and length/width ratios (Q) for each spore were calculated (Table 1). Line drawings were made with a Leica DM2500 microscope with the aid of a drawing tube.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

DNA isolation, amplification, purification and sequencing of four loci (ITS nrDNA, LSU nrDNA, tef-1α, rpb2) were performed following Martín et al. (2018). The raw sequences generated were edited, and contigs were assembled using Geneious version 9.0.2 (Kearse et al. 2012). Consensus sequences were accessioned in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases, and accession numbers are presented in Table 1.

Evaluation of EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases for X. raduloides sequence data was performed to maximize the molecular information available for this taxon. One sequence from Xylodon flaviporus (Riebesehl & Langer 2017) per marker was added to each dataset as an outgroup in phylogenetic analyses. MAFFT (Katoh & Standley 2013) was used to obtain sequence alignment for each region, with additional evaluation and edits of alignment performed using Geneious. A fifth alignment was performed for combined ITS + LSU sequence data. For this dataset, samples that lacked the LSU sequence were given a string of ‘?’ to represent missing data.

Phylogenetic analyses

Combined ITS + LSU phylogenetic tree estimation was performed using Bayesian inference (BI) implemented in BEAST v2.4.3 (Drummond & Rambaut 2007, Bouckaert et al. 2014). Site model partition was defined using BEAUti v2.4.3 interface for ITS and LSU separately. HKY + G substitution model was selected for both, as the closest available in BEAST from the results obtained in jModelTest2 (Darriba et al. 2012) following Bayesian information criterion (BIC). We used relative timing with an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock by calibrating the tree with a value of 1 in the root for the X. raduloides clade (Drummond et al. 2006). Coalescent (constant sites) model was used as tree prior. Two MCMC runs were specified for 50 million generations, sampling every 5000th generation. Tree and log files were combined in Logcombiner v.1.7 and results were visualized in Tracer v.1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2018), to evaluate whether the effective sample size (ESS) values were above 200. The resulting trees were summarized in a maximum clade credibility tree by TreeAnnotator v.1.7. with a burn-in of 5000. The same procedure was used to separately estimate phylogenetic trees for each region (ITS and LSU).

A multi-locus species coalescent approach was used to test alternative species delimitation hypotheses (Grummer et al. 2014). To accomplish this, a competing species delimitation model was used (Fig. 1). We explored a priori assignment of individuals to lineages following three hypotheses based on different sources of information. The first hypothesis (hypothesis-A) addressed traditional taxonomic classification, including all X. raduloides specimens as a single species, separated from X. flaviporus as outgroup. In the second hypothesis (hypothesis-B) geospatial characters were used by grouping specimens according to a North-South distribution, including all specimens from the Northern Hemisphere as a first species and assigning all specimens from the Southern Hemisphere as a second species. Finally, a DNA barcoding species delimitation obtained from the ITS tree was addressed in the third hypothesis (hypothesis-C), assigning each specimen to the species defined by the ITS tree.

Fig. 1
figure1

Hypothesized specimen assignment to each species hypothesis-model tested in this study. Species delimitation models are shown as columns, while lineages are shown as rows. Letters indicate geographic regions: E = Europe; NA = North America; P = Patagonia; A/NZ = Australia–New Zealand. (*) In Model-C, European taxon includes one sample from Cameroon (NY s.n.) and Australia–New Zealand taxa includes one specimen each from France (MA-Fungi 74,919) and Canada (FCUG 678)

We estimated species trees for each model using the coalescent-based inference program *BEAST with the four amplified DNA regions (ITS, LSU, tef-1α and rpb2). This method co-estimates gene and species trees from sequence data taking into account evolutionary processes that could generate species-tree/gene-tree discordance, such as incomplete lineage sorting (Mallo & Posada 2016). Substitution and clock models for each region were selected in the same procedure as for the ITS + LSU tree. Constant population function (population mean = 1) was used to model the species tree population size. A coalescent constant population prior was used to build the species tree. Tree and log files were managed in the same way as for the ITS + LSU tree (ESS values above 200; burn-in = 5000). In order to visualize the species tree and concordance between the four DNA regions, the Densitree v2.01 package included in BEAST v2.4.3 was used (Bouckaert 2010).

To assess the suitability of each species delimitation hypothesis proposed, Bayes factor delimitation (BFD) was performed following the framework of Grummer et al. (2014). Marginal likelihood for each hypothesis (MLEs), measured as log likelihoods, are calculated from the Bayesian posterior distributions through stepping-stone analyses using Path Sampler Analyser (BEAST model-selection package version 1.0.2; default parameters: alpha = 0.3, steps = 24, chain length = 100,000 and burn-in = 50%). Bayes factors are calculated as two times the difference in MLE between the best-fitting and alternative hypothesis (2lnBf). Hypothesis-C was used as the standard to compare against the other two hypotheses (hypothesis-C vs hypothesis-A and hypothesis-C vs hypothesis-B). Values of 2lnBf between 0 and 2 are interpreted as no significant differences in support for the two hypotheses. Values over 10 means decisive support in favor of the best-fitting hypothesis over its alternative (Kass & Raftery 1995).

Statistical tests of morphological characters

Basidiospore morphology was analyzed since sexual structures are valuable for species differentiation in fungi. One-way ANOVA tests were performed to assess the significance of differences in spore morphology between clades identified from multi-locus species coalescent analyses. Differences in spore morphology were evaluated using a Tukey HSD post-hoc test. Exploratory plots (i.e. residuals vs fitted values, normal Q-Q plots and residuals vs leverage) were used to detect and remove outliers from the morphological dataset. Two specimens (MA-Fungi 90,702 and MA-Fungi 74,919) from the total of 30 in the morphological dataset were removed after outlier identification.

Environmental niche equivalence analyses

We examined environmental characteristics to assess the degree of niche equivalency between species delimited with multi-locus species coalescent analyses. For each of the studied specimens (out-group excluded), geographical location (longitude and latitude) was obtained from herbarium labels or collection information. A set of 19 bioclimatic variables related to temperature and precipitation were obtained from the WorldClim2 cartographic dataset (Fick & Hijmans 2017, Table 2).

Table 2 Description of bioclimatic variables used in environmental niche modeling from WorldClim2

To characterize the bioclimatic niche for each species, a total of 10,000 random points was generated over the entire study area (worldwide) and their bioclimatic features were extracted from the 19 variables. This dataset, in addition to bioclimatic values for specimen locations, was used to calibrate a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) that represents the environmental space. Then, a kernel density function was applied to obtain the smoothed density of species occurrences in this environmental space. Further niche overlap analyses were performed using these kernel distributions rather than actual species occurrences (Broennimann et al. 2012).

In order to assess whether environmental niche can be used as a diagnostic character to distinguish between species of the X. raduloides complex, equivalence tests were performed using Schoener’s D index (Schoener 1970). This index is a metric of ecological similarity that ranges from 0 (no niche overlap) to 1 (complete overlap). Equivalence tests were conducted by comparing the environmental overlap values (D) of pairs of Xylodon species to a null distribution of 100 randomized overlap values. We determined non-equivalence of environmental niches if the niche overlap value of the two species being compared differed significantly from the overlap values from the null distribution. All analyses were performed in the R platform (R Development Core Team, 2014) using “ecospat” R package v1.0 (Di Cola et al. 2017).

RESULTS

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

A total of 77 sequences were generated in this study: 27 sequences for ITS region, 20 for LSU, 17 for rpb2 and 13 for tef-1α (Table 1). The maximum lengths of sequences were 618 for ITS, 1347 for LSU, 884 for rpb2 and 748 for tef-1α. The final alignments, including sequences retrieved from the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases contained 41 ITS sequences for a dataset length of 502 characters, 20 LSU sequences with 772 characters, 17 rpb2 sequences with 646 characters and 13 tef-1α sequences with 613 characters. No X. raduloides sequences were available for rpb2 and tef-1α regions from the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases.

Phylogenetic analysis

Results of the phylogenetic analysis of ITS, LSU, and ITS + LSU alignments are summarized in Fig. 2. All effective sample sizes were higher than 200 for all parameters. Bayesian inference analyses suggest the division of Xylodon raduloides complex into four well-supported monophyletic clades (posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.96 for all clades in the ITS tree), each restricted to their geographical distribution: Europe, North America, Patagonia, and Australia–New Zealand (Fig. 2). The only exceptions to this strong geographic pattern were two specimens in the Australia–New Zealand molecular clade that came from Europe and North America, while one specimen from Africa was resolved within the European clade.

Fig. 2
figure2

Topology of ITS + LSU tree obtained by Bayesian inference using BEAST. Bayesian posterior probabilities for the combined ITS and LSU dataset are indicated in the larger number above the boxes. Individual gene posterior probabilities for ITS and LSU regions are indicated in the left and right boxes on a branch, respectively. Filled and empty circles indicate whether ITS or LSU sequence of a sample was used in the analysis

Marginal likelihoods from multi-locus species coalescent analyses for each hypothesis and Bayes factors for hypothesis comparisons are shown in Table 3. The species hypothesis provided by the ITS barcoding approach (hypothesis-C) was the most probable scenario following Bayes factor scores (hypothesis-C vs hypothesis-A 2lnBf = 78.88; hypothesis-C vs hypothesis-B 2lnBf = 22.24), obtaining a Bayes factor > 10 for the second more probable scenario (“decisive” support for hypothesis-C against hypothesis-B). The species tree obtained from the multi-locus species coalescent approach for hypothesis-C defined four species divided into two well-supported clades (PP > 0.98; Fig. 3). The first clade grouped the two Holarctic species (European and North American species) and the second clade included Antarctic-Australian species (Patagonian and Australian–New Zealand species). The MCMC sample of gene trees obtained from *BEAST analyses for hypothesis-C was visualized by Densitree v2.01 and showed a high level of genealogical concordance with single DNA region trees (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Marginal likelihood estimates from each species tree hypothesis and Bayes factors (2lnBf) for hypotheses comparisons
Fig. 3
figure3

Species tree obtained from *BEAST applying multi-locus species coalescent approach for the four DNA regions used in the analyses (ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef-1α) and results from niche overlap analyses. Tree topology represents Model-C obtained from the ITS analyses. Posterior probabilities are shown as supports for each node. Blue background trees represent bootstrap gene tree topologies obtained from *BEAST. Diagonal maps show locations of the specimens. The upper right triangle of the matrix represents the results from niche overlap analyses. P-values of the equivalence test are shown above each histogram of randomization procedures. The bottom left triangle of the matrix shows species niches resulting from PCA analysis. The blue areas show overlapping environmental niches, while green and red represent niche ranges for row and column species, respectively. Shaded areas indicate kernel distributions for row species. Solid and dotted lines represent environmental availability for the whole study area

Statistical tests of morphological characters

ANOVA on basidiospore width, length and length/width ratio was conducted on 15 European specimens; one sample from Cameroon (NY s.n.); two North American specimens; six Patagonian specimens; and four Australia–New Zealand specimens (Fig. 4). The analysis did not detect any difference in spore width between species (F(3, 24) = 1.53, P-value = 0.23). However, differences were detected in spore length and length/width ratios (Q) between Northern (Europe and North America) and Southern (Patagonia and Australia-New Zealand) hemisphere samples (F(3, 24) = 11.52, P-value < 0.05 and F(3, 24) = 7.96, P-value < 0.05 respectively; Fig. 4). In the post-hoc Tukey HSD tests significant differences were found for spore length/width ratios between inter-hemisphere comparisons: Europe and Patagonia; Europe and Australia-New Zealand; North America and Patagonia; and North America and Australia–New Zealand (P-values < 0.05). However, the Tukey HSD test did not show significant differences in spore length in the inter-hemisphere comparison between North America and Australia–New Zealand (P-value = 0.19).

Fig. 4
figure4

ANOVA results for basidiospore morphology. Bar plots of Xylodon species basidiospore width (W), length (L) and length/width ratios (Q)

Environmental niche equivalency analyses

The PCA performed with the 19 bioclimatic variables accumulated 76.71% of the variance in the first two axes (Axis 1: 50.32%; Axis 2: 26.39%; Fig. 3). For niche comparisons, two axes rather than one were selected to obtain a more complete view of niche dimensions, since the first axis represented only 50% of environmental variability. Axis 1 described mainly a gradient between regions with high temperature seasonality (BIO4) and high temperature annual range (BIO7) (positive values in axis 1) and areas with a high isothermality (BIO3) (negative values in axis 1). The environmental pattern of Axis 2 was less clear with areas of high temperature diurnal range (BIO2) and high precipitation seasonality (BIO15) on one side (positive values in axis 2) and regions with high precipitation during dry seasons (BIO14, BIO17) on the other side (negative values in axis 2). Kernel densities were then built for each clade from the coordinates (PC scores) of group occurrences in this two-dimensional environmental space created by the two first axes of the principal components analyses.

In general, environmental space occupied by North American and European occurrence kernels were placed in higher values for both axis 1 and axis 2 in the PCA (top-right) than Patagonian and Australia–New Zealand kernels (bottom-left, Fig. 3). That pattern describes a more seasonal niche for Northern Hemisphere species, while Southern Hemisphere species showed preferences for isothermal and humid areas.

Niche equivalence could not be rejected between North American and European species (P-value = 0.35, Fig. 3). A similar pattern was found for Patagonian and Australia–New Zealand niches, where the niche equivalence hypothesis could not be rejected between these two species (P-value = 0.84, Fig. 3). However, when inter-hemisphere environmental niches were compared, significant differences were observed for all species (niche equivalence was rejected; P-values < 0.05, Fig. 3).

Based on a combination of taxonomic information, three new species are described here: Xylodon laurentianus, X. novozelandicus, and X. patagonicus.

TAXONOMY

Xylodon raduloides Riebesehl & Langer, Mycol. Progr. 16: 649 (2017).

Replaced name: Poria radula Pers., Observ. Mycol. 2: 14 (1800).

Synonyms: Polyporus radula (Pers.) Fr., Syst. Mycol. 1: 383 (1821); nom. Sanct.

Schizopora radula (Pers.) Hallenb., Mycotaxon 18: 308 (1983).

Hyphodontia radula (Pers.) Langer & Vesterh., Nordic J. Bot. 16: 212 (1996).

Kneiffiella radula (Pers.) Zmitr. & Malysheva, Pyatnadts. Respubl. Molod. Nauchn. Konf.: 103 (2004).

Non Xylodon radula (Fr.) Tura et al. 2011, Biodiv. Heterobasid. non-gilled Hymen. Israel: 219 (2011); based on Hydnum radula Fr., Obs. Mycol. 2: 271 (1818); nom. Sanct.

Type: [locality unknown, substrate unknown], “Poria radula” [Persoon’s hand] (L0117159 [Herb. Ludgd. Bat. 910.277–305] – neotype designated by Donk 1967: 106, as “type”).

Description: Basidioma resupinate, effuse, adnate; hymenophore poroid, 1–4 pores/mm, regular to angular, dissepiments dentate in old specimens, on vertical substrata irregularly irpicoid with flattened teeth, yellow-white to orange-yellow (92. y White – 71. m. OY); margin clearly differentiated, paler (Fig. 5a). Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae hyaline, thin to thick-walled, sparsely branched, with clamps, 3–5 μm wide; subicular hyphae loosely interwoven, parallel to substratum (Fig. 6a); subhymenial hyphae, perpendicular to the substratum (Fig. 6b). Cystidia or rather cystidial elements present: (1) capitate, subcylindrical, fusiform or moniliform cystidia arise from the hymenium (Fig. 6c), sometimes encrusted or with an apical bladder, thin-walled, with basal clamp, 17–26 × 3–5 μm; (2) capitate hyphae arise from the subiculum (Fig. 6d), sometimes with a thin-walled apical bladder, thin to thick-walled, with basal clamp, 30–40 × 3–4.5 μm, apex to 9 μm diam; and (3) tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia” arise from the subiculum (Fig. 6e), with very thick walls narrowing to the apex, with basal clamp, 120–150 × 3–5 μm. Basidia cylindrical to suburniform, (15–)18–21 × 4–5 μm, four sterigmata, with basal clamp (Fig. 6c). Basidiospores ellipsoidal, (4.5–)5–5.5(− 7) × (2.5–)3–3.5(− 4.5) μm, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, guttulate (Fig. 6f). L = 5.34, W = 3.33, Q = 1.60.

Fig. 5
figure5

Basidioma of Xylodon species. a. Xylodon raduloides (755MD, MA-Fungi 12,864). b, c. Xylodon laurentianus (B. HHB-719, CFMR, holotype; C. DLL2009–049, CFMR). d–f. Xylodon patagonicus (D. 19684Tell., MA-Fungi 90,707, holotype; E. 14,180 MD, MA-Fungi 90,702, young specimen; F. 19705Tell., MA-Fungi 90,706, old specimen). g, h. Xylodon novozelandicus (G. Paulus 98/20, PDD 70718, holotype; H. Paulus 98/104, PDD 70720). Bars = 1 mm

Fig. 6
figure6

Xylodon raduloides, 002JFL, MA-Fungi 90,709. a. Subicular hyphae. b. Subhymenial hyphae. c. Hymenium with cystidia and basidia. d. Capitate hyphae. e. Tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia”. f. basidiospores. Bar = 10 μm

Ecology and habitat: On rotted wood of Alnus, Carpinus, Castanea, Eucalyptus, Fagus, Quercus, and Tilia. Present in areas with seasonal climate, warm and dry summers and cold winters.

Known distribution: Widespread in Europe, also known from Africa (Canary Islands and Cameroon).

Notes: Xylodon raduloides has been reported from northern Iran (Hallenberg, 1983) but we did not study any specimens from the Middle-East region.

The name X. raduloides unfortunately had to be introduced because when the combination Xylodon radula (Fr.) Tura et al. was made the basionym cited was that of Fries and not that of Persoon, which does not belong to this taxon but to Basidioradulum radula (Fr.) Nobles. Even though the name may have been inadvertently misapplied, the combination into Xylodon was nevertheless validly published and has to be maintained and applied in accordance with its type, unless a formal conservation proposal was made and eventually accepted. As the name X. raduloides has already been introduced to deal with the situation, in order to avoid further possible confusions we retain X. raduloides here.

Material examined: Cameroon: Sakbayeme, 29 Apr. 1980, Rev. Chas. Schwab, (NY s.n., as Schizopora subiculoides). – Canary Islands: Tenerife: Esperanza forest, on Eucalyptus, 17 Jan. 1990, R Korf (MA-Fungi 35,643). – France: Moselle, Monterhouse, Canton de Bitche, Forêt Domainale de Monterhouse (parcéle M-43), 280 msl, on dead wood, 25 Oct. 2009, I. Melo, I. Salcedo & M.T. Telleria 12028IS (MA-Fungi 79,442); Moselle, Parc Naturel des Vosges du Nord, Pays de Bitche, Forêt Domaniale de Haut III, Rothenbruch Reserve, 49°01′00″N 7°35′50″E, 250 msl, on Fagus sylvatica, 29 Oct. 2009, I. Melo, I. Salcedo & M.T. Telleria 18336Tell. (MA-Fungi 79,314); Pyrénées-Orientales, Languedoc-Rosillon, Massif des Albères, Lavall, 42°30′27″N 3°00′18″E, 225 msl, on Quercus suber, 5 Nov. 2008, M. Dueñas, I. Melo, I. Salcedo & M.T. Telleria, 11851IS (MA-Fungi 78,658); Seine-et-Marne, Fontainebleau, Réserve Integrale, Gorge aux Loups (parcéle 527), 90 msl, on Fagus sylvatica, 30 Oct. 2006, M. Dueñas, I. Melo, I. Salcedo & M.T. Telleria, 11074MD (MA-Fungi 70,457). – Spain: Asturias: Reserva Biológica de Muniellos, on Quercus robur, 15 June 1983, N. Brito, F.D. Calonge, M. Dueñas, V. Pou & M.T. Telleria 755MD (MA-Fungi 12,864). Ávila: Gavilanes, 40°13′18″N 4°50′15″W, on Quercus ilex, Nov. 2015, J. Fernández-López 002JFL (MA-Fungi 90,709). Cantabria: Potes, Monte Tolibe, 450 msl, on Quercus suber, 1 Apr. 1985, P. Coello, M. Dueñas, K. Escalante & M.T. Telleria 6996Tell. (MA-Fungi 12,877); Ciudad Real, Fuencaliente, Robledo de las Ollas, 770 msl, on Quercus suber, 12 Apr. 2007, F. Prieto & A. González GP2291 (MA-Fungi 75,310); ibid., Valle de la Cerceda, 880 msl, on Quercus pyrenaica, 16 Dec. 2004, F. Prieto, A. González & al. GP2162 (MA-Fungi 75,244); ibid., 18 Nov. 2005, F. Prieto, A. González & al., GP2241 (MA-Fungi 75,130); Huelva, El Barraco, Coto de Doñana, on Quercus suber, 24 Nov. 1977, F.D. Calonge (MA-Fungi 608); Palencia, Cervera de Pisuerga, on Quercus pyrenaica, 20 Nov. 1984, N. Brito, M. Dueñas & M.T. Telleria 2266MD (MA-Fungi 12,778); Toledo, between Fresnedilla and El Real de San Vicente, on Castanea sativa, 29 May 1988, M. Dueñas, 4719MD (MA-Fungi 22,499); idem, 4736MD (MA-Fungi 22,513); ibid., Velada, los Baldíos, río Guadyerbas, 395 msl, on Quercus faginea, 28 Mar. 2006, F. Prieto, A. González & F.D. Calonge GP2253 (MA-Fungi 75,272).

Xylodon laurentianus J. Fernández-López, Telleria, M. Dueñas, & M.P. Martín, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB288019. (Figs. 5b, C and 7)

Fig. 7
figure7

Xylodon laurentianus, HHB-719, CFMR, holotype. a. Subhymenial hyphae. b. Hymenium with cystidia and basidia. c. Capitate hyphae. d. Tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia”. e. Basidiospores. Bar = 10 μm

Etymology: Named after Laurentia, the ancient geological core (craton) of the North American continent, where the species is distributed.

Diagnosis: Morphologically this species is similar to Xylodon raduloides, but can be distinguished by the narrowly ellipsoid to subcylindrical basidiospores, (4.5–)5–6 × 2.5–3.5 μm (Q = 1.70), instead of the ellipsoid ones, (4.5–)5–5.5(− 7) × (2.5–)3–3.5(− 4.5) μm (Q = 1.60) in X. raduloides.

Type: USA: Washington DC: Ruch Drive, Rock Creek Park, on Quercus log, 18 June 1968, H.H. Burdsall Jr. HHB-719 (CFMR – holotype; Forest Products Laboratory (USDA) – ex-type culture: ITS, LSU and tef-1 sequences GenBank KY962845, KY962865, and KY967076).

Description: Basidioma resupinate, effuse, adnate; hymenophore poroid to labyrinthiform, 1–4 pores/mm, dissepiments lacerate to dentate in old specimens, on vertical substrata irregularly irpicoid with flattened teeth, orange-yellow (70. l. OY – 71. m. OY); margin not clearly differentiated. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae hyaline, thin to thick-walled, sparsely branched, with clamps, 3–5 μm wide; subicular hyphae not seen; subhymenial hyphae loosely interwoven, perpendicular to substratum. Cystidia or rather cystidial elements present: (1) capitate and subulate cystidia, sometimes encrusted, arise from the hymenium, thin-walled, with basal clamp, 14–32 × 3.5–5 μm; (2) capitate hyphae sometimes encrusted, thin-walled, with basal clamp, 25–46 × 3–4 μm, apex to 8 μm diam; and (3) tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia” sometimes encrusted, with very thick walls narrowing to the apex, with basal clamp, 170–200 × 3.5–5.5 μm. Basidia cylindrical to suburniform, (13–)18–26 × 4.5–5.5 μm, four sterigmata, with basal clamp. Basidiospores narrowly ellipsoidal to subcylindrical, (4.5–)5–6 × 2.5–3.5 μm, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, guttulate. L = 5.22, W = 3.08, Q = 1.70.

Ecology and habitat: On dead wood of Quercus. Present in areas with a seasonal climate, warm and dry summers and cold winters.

Known distribution: Reported from Central and Eastern USA (Minnesota and Washington DC).

Additional material examined: USA: Minnesota: St Louis County, Independence, on dead wood, 28 Oct. 2009, D.L. Lindner DLL2009–049 (CFMR).

Xylodon patagonicus J. Fernández-López, Telleria, M. Dueñas, & M.P. Martín, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB288018. (Figs. 5d-f and 8)

Fig. 8
figure8

Xylodon patagonicus, 19684Tell., MA-Fungi 90,707, holotype. a. Subhymenial hyphae. b. Hymenium with cystidia and basidia. c. Capitate hyphae. d. Tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia”. e. Basidiospores. Bar = 10 μm

Etymology. Named after Patagonia, the region where the holotype was collected.

Diagnosis: Morphologically similar to Xylodon raduloides, but differs in having smaller basidia, 13–18 × 3–4.5 μm, and shorter basidiospores, (3.5–)4–5.5(− 6) × (2–)2.5–3.5(− 4.5) μm with Q = 1.46.

Type: Chile: Los Lagos (X Región): Palena, Comuna Hualaihué, Comau Fjord, Huinay, “Cementerio de Alerces”, 42°21′57.9″S 72°24′56.9″W, 30 msl, on Amomyrtus luma, 29 Apr. 2012, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 19684Tell (MA-Fungi 90,707 –holotype; ITS, LSU and rpb2 sequences GenBank KY962837, KY962855, and KY967061).

Description: Basidioma resupinate, effuse, adnate, orbicular to confluent; hymenophore poroid to labyrinthiform, 1–5 pores/mm, dissepiments lacerate to dentate in old specimens, on vertical substrata irregularly irpicoid with flattened teeth, yellow-white to orange-yellow (92. y White – 71. m. OY); margin not clearly differentiated. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae hyaline, thin to thick-walled, branched, with clamps, 2.5–4 μm wide; subiculum not clearly differentiated; subhymenial hyphae loosely interwoven, perpendicular to substratum. Cystidia or rather cystidial elements present: (1) capitate and subulate cystidia, sometimes encrusted, arise from the hymenium, thin-walled, with basal clamp, 17.5–25 × 3–4 μm; (2) capitate hyphae, thin-walled, basal clamp, 22–56 × 2.5–4 μm, apex up to 8 μm diam; and (3) tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia” very thick-walled narrowing to the apex, basal clamp, 80–115 × 3–4 μm. Basidia cylindrical to suburniform, 13–18 × 3–4.5 μm, four sterigmata, with basal clamp. Basidiospores ellipsoidal, (3.5)4–5.5(− 6) × (2–)2.5–3.5(− 4.5) μm, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, guttulate. L = 4.56, W = 3.11, Q = 1.46.

Ecology and habitat: On dead wood of Nothofagus nitida and N. dombeyi (Nothofagaceae), and Amomyrtus luma (Myrtaceae). Present in areas with a mild climate, with low annual variations in temperature, and high humidity during dry season.

Known distribution: Reported from the Patagonian region (southern Chile and southern Argentina).

Notes: Poria platensis was described from Argentina by Spegazzini (1902) and later synonymized by Lowe (1963) with Schizopora paradoxa. Hallenberg (1983) segregated Schizopora radula (i.e. Xylodon raduloides) from S. paradoxa and therefore P. platensis could be related to the X. raduloides complex, and more specifically with X. patagonicus, but the substrate was given as on Pinus beams rather than on a hardwood so is unlikely to be conspecific. No specimens of this taxon were available to study and investigate this further.

Additional material examined: Chile: Los Lagos (X Región): Palena, Comau Fjord, Comuna Hualaihué, Huinay, path to Cerro del Tambor, 42°22′53.2″S 72°24′44.0″W, 125 msl, on fallen logs, 26 Apr. 2012, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 3341MPM (MA-Fungi 90,704); idem, 3340MPM (MA-Fungi 90,708); ibid., on Nothofagus nitida wood, 26 Apr. 2012, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 14007MD (MA-Fungi 90,705); ibid., path to Cerro del Tambor behind hydroelectric power station, 42°22′54.2″S 72°24′53.5″W, 202 msl, on fallen logs, 8 May 2013, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 3567MPM (MA-Fungi 90,703); ibid., “Derrumbe Antiguo”, 42°22′17.0″S 72°24′12.2″W, 120 msl, on Nothofagus dombeyi, 1 May 2012, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 14,180 MD (MA-Fungi 90,702); ibid., Lloncochaigua river bank, near to the bridge, 42°22′09.0″S 72°24′42.7″W), 19 msl, on dead wood, 30 Apr. 2012, M. Dueñas, M.P. Martín & M.T. Telleria 19705Tell (MA-Fungi 90,706).

Xylodon novozelandicus J. Fernández-López, Telleria, M. Dueñas, & M.P. Martín, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB828020. (Figs. 5g, h and 9)

Fig. 9
figure9

Xylodon novozelandicus, Paulus 98/20, PDD 70718, holotype. a. Subhymenial hyphae. b. Hymenium with cystidia and basidia. c. Capitate hyphae. d. Tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia”. e. Basidiospores. Bar = 10 μm

Etymology: Named after New Zealand, where the holotype was collected.

Diagnosis: This species is morphologically similar to Xylodon patagonicus, but differs in having subcylindrical cystidia arising from the hymenium.

Type: New Zealand: Wellington, Kaitoki, Swingbridge Track, on dead wood in “Podocarp/Broadleaf forest”, 22 Feb. 1998, I.G. Steer & B.C. Paulus, B.C. Paulus 98/20 (PDD 70718 – holotype; ICMP13838 – ex-type culture; ITS, LSU and tef-1 sequences GenBank AF145578, KY962851, and KY967069).

Description: Basidioma resupinate, effuse, adnate; hymenophore poroid to labyrinthiform, 1–4 pores/mm, dissepiments lacerate to dentate in old specimens, orange-yellow (70. l. OY); margin not clearly differentiated. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae hyaline, thin to thick-walled, encrusted, branched, with clamps, 2.5–4.5 μm wide; subicular hyphae not seen; subhymenial hyphae loosely interwoven, perpendicular to the substratum. Cystidia or rather cystidial elements present: (1) capitate, subcylindrical and subulate cystidia, sometimes encrusted, arise from the hymenium, thin-walled, basal clamped, 13–27 × 3.5–4.5 μm; (2) capitate hyphae, thin-walled, with basal clamp, 28–34 × 2–3.5 μm, apex up to 9 μm diam; and (3) tubular hyphae or “skeletocystidia” very thick-walled narrowing to the apex, with basal clamp, 110–150 × 3.5–4.5 μm. Basidia cylindrical to suburniform, (9–)10–15 × 3–4.5 μm, four sterigmata, with basal clamp. Basidiospores ellipsoidal, 4–6 × (2.5–)3–4(− 4.5) μm, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, guttulate. L = 4.71, W = 3.21, Q = 1.47.

Ecology and habitat: Growing on dead wood identified as Carpinus betulus and Fuscospora cliffortioides. Present in areas with a mild climate, low annual variations in temperature, and high humidity during the dry season.

Known distribution: Reported from Australasia (Australia and New Zealand). Also found in France and Canada (British Columbia).

Notes: Timber trade and transport could easily explain this distribution pattern for both French and Canadian samples (Table 1, Fig. 3). No morphological study was carried out on the Canadian sample, since the ITS sequence was obtained from a culture. However, a morphological study of the French specimen revealed differences in spore morphology from New Zealand material, being similar to those from the European clade, so this trait could be linked to environmental conditions.

Additional material examined: France: Côtes-d’Armor: Commune de Plévenon, Saint Cast-le Guildo, La Fresnaye, 48°38′33.7″N, 2°16′31.7″W, 15 msl, on Carpinus betulus wood, 24 Oct. 2010, M. Dueñas, I. Melo, I. Salcedo & M.T. Telleria 12836IS (MA-Fungi 74,919). – New Zealand: Buller, South of Punakaiki Field Centre, “Lifestyle Blocks”, on fallen branches, 16 May 1998, I.G. Steer & B.C. Paulus, B.C. Paulus 98/81 (PDD 70716; ICMP 13841 – culture); Mid-Canterbury, on Fuscospora cliffortioides wood, 11 May 2006, A. Roberts & B.C. Paulus (PDD 91616); ibid., Christchurch, Riccarton Bush, fallen branch, 17 May 1998, I.G. Steer & B.C. Paulus, B.C. Paulus 98/104 (PDD 70720; ICMP 13840 – culture).

DISCUSSION

Morphological species recognition has limits in a group like the Xylodon raduloides species complex; alone, it would not likely identify the species and geographic diversity revealed during this study. Our ITS and LSU analyses revealed four species within the X. raduloides complex (Fig. 2). These species were confirmed in a multi-locus coalescent framework, since the Bayes factors approach further established the ITS species proposal (hypothesis-C) as the most probable given the data. The ability of ITS sequence data to detect hidden diversity in fungi has been questioned leading to the suggestion that a multi-locus approach should be used (Balasundaram et al. 2015). Our results suggest that the ITS region performs well for the X. raduloides species complex, but this is likely context dependent so general inferences about its utility in species delimitation should be cautious as they may strongly depend on the group being studied (Balasundaram et al. 2015, Wilson et al. 2017a).

Although the ITS region is a powerful tool for discriminating between fungal species, as it is a non-transcribed, non-coding region makes it prone to accumulate homoplasies (Nagy et al. 2012). This accumulation of random homoplasies means the ITS region alone is not generally useful to study inter-species relationships. Thus, the multi-locus species coalescent approach allowed for comparison of relationships between species since internal nodes showed high support for geographic relationships (Fig. 3). Salgado-Salazar et al. (2013) used this method to separate 16 distinct highly supported lineages in the morphologically circumscribed Thelonectria discophora which were linked to different geographic areas and ecological settings.

The multi-locus phylogenetic approach, which incorporated rpb2, and tef-1α along with ITS and LSU sequence data, revealed that Holarctic taxa (X. raduloides and X. laurentianus) were more genetically related, and that X. patagonicus and X. novozelandicus shared a recent common ancestor (Fig. 3). While it has been demonstrated that fungal distributions can be human-mediated (Fuller et al. 2013), only two specific instances of possible human translocation are supported by our results: specimens of X. novozelandicus were reported from France and Canada. As a result, the extant biogeographic distribution of the Xylodon species studied is likely due to natural processes.

Our results correlate with geography and suggest allopatric differentiation within the Xylodon species in this study, confirming the proposal of Paulus et al. (2000). This geographic phylogenetic structure has been observed in other basidiomycetes, like the Schizophyllum commune complex (James et al. 2001), the genus Lentinula (Hibbett 2001) and the lethal amanitas (Amanita sect. Phalloideae; Cai et al. 2014). This reveals the importance of geographic separation in genetic isolation and gene flow in fungi (Taylor et al. 2006). In other cases, such as in Laccaria (ectomycorrhizal fungi), in addition to geographic barriers, a study of host associations is necessary to obtain a proper understanding of the factors that explain species distributions (Wilson et al. 2017b). These results show that multiple factors can affect the biogeographical patterns in fungi.

Biogeographical patterns shown by the Southern Hemisphere species agree with the general pattern observed for most Gondwanan groups of plants (Sanmartín & Ronquist 2004). A deep vicariance event could be inferred between X. patagonicus and X. novozelandicus, which could be due to the geological breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana approximately 80 MYA (Scotese et al. 1988). Molecular differences were not found between Australian and New Zealand specimens of X. novozelandicus, suggesting the absence of genetic isolation. Dispersal events between Australia and New Zealand may well explain how a single species in these two areas is maintained, while remaining genetically isolated from X. patagonicus. This dispersal ability has been commonly observed in Southern Hemisphere plants (Seberg 1991, Linder & Crisp 1995, Knapp et al. 2005) and fungi (Moncalvo & Buchanan 2008, Peterson et al. 2010, Wilson et al. 2017b).

The close relationship between woody plants and corticioid fungi suggests a shared historical biogeography. In this context, little is known about host specificity for the X. raduloides complex. A variety of hosts (Alnus, Carpinus, Quercus, Tilia, etc.) have been reported in the European region (Langer 1994, Ryvarden & Melo 2014), while for the New Zealand region it has been reported on decayed southern beech: Fuscospora cliffortioides, F. fusca, Lophozonia menziesii (Clinton et al. 2009). In general, current knowledge points toward a broad range of hosts for the X. raduloides complex, which could account for the worldwide distribution.

The geographic and phylogenetic patterns confirm that for the X. raduloides complex, as in other basidiomycetes (Hibbett 2001), the hypothesis “everything is everywhere” is not applicable. The traditional dependence on morphological species recognition criteria has led to an underestimate of species diversity and did not reveal the actual distribution patterns for the Xylodon species in our study.

Morphological analysis of diversity in the X. raduloides complex confirms that basidiospore morphology may be only partially effective as an inter-specific diagnostic character in these fungi. Spore shape (length to width ratio, Q) was able to distinguish between Northern and Southern Hemisphere groups (Fig. 4). Northern Hemisphere specimens have longer spores, while spores of Southern Hemisphere species have a more spherical shape. No statistical differences were found among intra-hemisphere specimens (Fig. 4). This observation could be due to the close phylogenetic relationship within Northern and Southern Hemisphere species, supported by our molecular results (Figs. 2, 3). While little attention has been paid to spore morphology (Parmasto & Parmasto 1992), their importance as dispersion propagules, in sexual reproduction and gene flow in fungi (Kauserud et al. 2008) makes them an informative diagnostic character even when morphological stasis is observed for other traits. However, spore morphology may be insufficient to discriminate recent speciation in the inter-Hemisphere X. raduloides complex.

Environmental niche analyses performed for the species complex showed non-equivalence between Northern and Southern Hemisphere species niches (Fig. 3). Bioclimatic associations also were in concordance with molecular data and separate the complex by Hemisphere. Environmental traits that defined these two groups could be summarized in an isothermal-seasonal gradient. Northern Hemisphere species are acclimated to a more seasonal environment, with warmer and drier summers and colder winters; while Southern Hemisphere species fructified in mild climates, characterized by low annual thermal variations and more humidity during the dry season. These results indicate that phylogenetically related species occupy similar environmental niches.

The correlation between spore morphology and environmental features in the X. raduloides complex is interesting. There is a demonstrated relationship between spore morphology and environmental conditions in many other fungi (Kauserud et al. 2008). The metabolic costs of spore production make it subject to evolutionary fitness (Stearns 1992). Larger spores are correlated with more seasonal areas; this association could be explained by the necessity of storing more nutrients for the transition from dry season to sporophore production (Kauserud et al. 2011). This hypothesis is in agreement with our results for the X. raduloides complex, since the Northern Hemisphere group –with a more seasonal climate– showed spores of greater volume by virtue of being longer than the spores from the Southern Hemisphere species (Fig. 4). Whether or not the concordance between environmental characteristics and spore morphology is indicative of a cause and effect relationship remains to be evaluated in this complex, since the correlation between environmental and morphological traits could also be explained by the shared evolutionary and geographic history between sister species. Further phylogenetic comparative analysis, e.g. assessing the phylogenetic signal for spore morphology or environmental preferences (Felsenstein 1985, Grafen 1989, Revell et al. 2008) should be conducted to specifically test these hypotheses.

Conclusions

In this study, the diversity of Xylodon raduloides is addressed from multiple complementary perspectives, separating this species complex into four species: Xylodon raduloides, X. laurentianus sp. nov., X. novozelandicus sp. nov., and X. patagonicus sp. nov.. These species are distributed geographically in Europe, North America, Australia–New Zealand and Patagonia, respectively. The methods of integrative taxonomy, using molecular, morphological and ecological traits, demonstrates that molecular results are confirmed by morphological and ecological traits that could be used as diagnostic characters for other species complexes of corticioid fungi. The combination of molecular tools with morphological and ecological approaches could also clarify what traits have been affected by phylogenetic constraints, or those that are driving the evolutionary processes.

Availability of data and materials

All material examined are located in public fungaria and culture collections. All sequences files are available from the GenBank database. The complete list of accession numbers is included in Table 1. They will be public after the paper is published.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of Variance

BFD:

Bayes factor delimitation

BI:

Bayesian inference

BIC:

Bayesian information criterion

CFMR:

Center for Forest Mycology Research

D index:

Distance index

DDBJ:

DNA Data Bank of Japan

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

EMBL:

The European Molecular Biology Laboratory

ESS:

Effective Simple Size

GCPSR:

Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition

GIS:

Geographic Information System

HKY + G:

Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano plus Gamma

HSD:

Honestly-significant-difference

ICMP:

International Collection of Microorganisms for Plants

ISCC-NBS:

Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau for Standards

ITS:

Internal Transcribed Spacer

L:

Length

LSU:

Large Subunit

MA-Fungi:

Fungus collections of the Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid, Spain

MCMC:

Markov chain Monte Carlo

MLEs:

Marginal Likelihood for Each hypothesis

MYA:

Million Years Ago

nrDNA:

nuclear ribosomal DNA

NY:

The William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden

PC:

Principal Components

PCA:

Principal Components Analysis

PDD:

New Zealand Fungarium

PP:

Posterior Probabilities

P-value:

Probability value

Q:

Length to width ratio

Q-Q plot:

Qualitative-Qualitative plot

R:

A language and environment for statistical computing and graphics

rpb2:

the second-largest subunit of RNA polymerase II

tef-1α:

Translation elongation factor 1 α

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

vs:

Versus

W:

Width

References

  1. Ahmadzadeh F, Flecks M, Carretero MA, Mozaffari O, Böhme W et al (2013) Cryptic speciation patterns in Iranian rock lizards uncovered by integrative taxonomy. PLoS One 8:e80563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080563

  2. Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, Buyck B, Chethana KWT et al (2015) Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75:27–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5

  3. Baas Becking LGM (1934) Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. Serie 18/19. Van Stockum WP & Zoon NV (eds). The Netherlands

  4. Balasundaram SV, Engh IB, Skrede I, Kauserud H (2015) How many DNA markers are needed to reveal cryptic fungal species? Fungal Biology 119:940–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.07.006

  5. Bouckaert R (2010) DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 26:1372–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq110

  6. Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH et al (2014) BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 10:e1003537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537

  7. Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB, Petitpierre B, Pellissier L et al (2012) Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x

  8. Cai L, Giraud T, Zhang N, Begerow D, Cai G et al (2011) The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Diversity 50:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0127-8

  9. Cai Q, Tulloss RE, Tang LP, Tolgor B, Zhang P et al (2014) Multi-locus phylogeny of lethal amanitas: implications for species diversity and historical biogeography. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-143

  10. Carlsen T, Engh IB, Decock C, Rajchenberg M, Kauserud H (2011) Multiple cryptic species with divergent substrate affinities in the Serpula himantioides species complex. Fungal Biology 115:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-143

  11. Chen CC, Wu SH, Chen CY (2018) Xylodon subflaviporus sp. nov. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from East Asia. Mycoscience 59:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

  12. Clinton PW, Buchanan PK, Wilkie JP, Smaill SJ, Kimberleyc MO (2009) Decomposition of Nothofagus wood in vitro and nutrient mobilization by fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:2193–2202. https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-134

  13. Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ, Wingfield MJ, Carnegie AJ, Hernández-Restrepo M et al (2018) Fungal planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 41:238–417. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.12

  14. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9:772–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

  15. Dayrat B (2005) Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x

  16. Di Cola V, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Breiner FT, D'Amen M et al (2017) Ecospat: an R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 40:774–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02671

  17. Donk MA (1967) Notes on European polypores – II. Persoonia 5:47–130 https://www.repository.naturalis.nl/record/532338

  18. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4:e88. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088

  19. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537

  20. Edwards SV (2009) Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging. Evolution 63:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x

  21. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125:1–15 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2461605

  22. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37:4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086

  23. Fuller R, Johnston P, Pearson M (2013) Schizophyllum commune: a case study for testing the potential introduction of non-native strains into New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 51:286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2013.829503

  24. Ghobad-Nejhad M (2011) Updated checklist of corticioid and poroid basidiomycetes of the Caucasus region. Mycotaxon 117:508. https://doi.org/10.5248/117.508

  25. Gilbertson RL (1980) Wood-rotting Fungi of North America. Mycologia 72:1–49

  26. Giraud T, Refrégier G, Le Gac M, de Vienne DM, Hood ME (2008) Speciation in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 45:791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2008.02.001

  27. Gorjón SP, Hallenberg N (2013) Some new species and a first checklist of corticioid fungi (Basidiomycota) from Chile. Mycological Progress 12:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0824-z

  28. Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 326: 119–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1989.0106

  29. Greslebin AG, Rajchenberg M (2003) Diversity of Corticiaceae Sens. Lat. In Patagonia, southern Argentina. New Zealand Journal of Botany 41:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2003.9512861

  30. Grummer JA, Bryson RW, Reeder TW (2014) Species delimitation using Bayes factors: simulations and application to the Sceloporus scalaris species group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae). Systematic Biology 63:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt069

  31. Hallenberg N (1983) On the Schizopora paradoxa complex (Basidiomycetes). Mycotaxon 18:303–313

  32. Hallenberg N (1991) Speciation and distribution in Corticiaceae (Basidiomycetes). Plant Systematics and Evolution 177:93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937830

  33. Heled J, Drummond AJ (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp274

  34. Hibbett DS (2001) Shiitake mushrooms and molecular clocks: historical biogeography of Lentinula. Journal of Biogeography 28:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00528.x

  35. Hibbett DS, Bauer R, Binder M, Giachini AJ, Hosaka K et al (2014) Agaricomycetes. In: McLaughlin D, Spatafora JW (eds) The Mycota. Vol. VII. Systematics and Evolution, Part A, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp 373–429

  36. Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L (2009) A checklist of names in Hyphodontia sensu stricto – sensu lato and Schizopora with new combinations in Lagarobasidium, Lyomyces, Kneifiella, Schizopora and Xylodon. Synopsis Fungorum 26:33–55

  37. James TY, Moncalvo JM, Li S (2001) Polymorphism at the ribosomal DNA spacers and its relation to breeding structure of the widespread mushroom Schizophyllum commune. Genetics 157:149–161

  38. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:773–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091

  39. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

  40. Kauserud H, Colman JE, Ryvarden L (2008) Relationship between basidiospore size, shape and life history characteristics: a comparison of polypores. Fungal Ecology 1:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2007.12.001

  41. Kauserud H, Heegaard E, Halvorsen R, Boddy L, Høiland K et al (2011) Mushroom’s spore size and time of fruiting are strongly related: is moisture important? Biology Letters 7:273–276. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0820

  42. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M et al (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

  43. Kelly KL, Judd DB (1976) COLOR. Universal language and dictionary of names. National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication 440. USA

  44. Kingman JFC (1982) The coalescent. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 13:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(82)90011-4

  45. Knapp M, Stöckler K, Havell D, Delsuc F, Sebastiani F et al (2005) Relaxed molecular clock provides evidence for long-distance dispersal of Nothofagus (southern beech). PLoS Biology 3:e14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030014

  46. Knight S, Goddard MR (2015) Quantifying separation and similarity in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae metapopulation. ISME Journal 9:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.132

  47. Langer E (1994) Die Gattung Hyphodontia John Eriksson. Bibliotheca Mycologica 154:1–298

  48. Larsson KH (2007) Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi. Mycological Research 111:1040–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.001

  49. Linder HP, Crisp MD (1995) Nothofagus and Pacific biogeography. Cladistics 11:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1995.tb00002.x

  50. Lowe JL (1963) The Polyporaceae of the world. Mycologia 55:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3756376

  51. Lumbsch HT, Buchanan PK, May TW, Mueller GM (2008) Phylogeography and biogeography of fungi. Mycological Research 112:423–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.02.002

  52. Mallo D, Posada D (2016) Multilocus inference of species trees and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 371: 20150335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0335

  53. Marske KA, Leschen RAB, Buckley TR (2012) Concerted versus independent evolution and the search for multiple refugia: comparative phylogeography of four forest beetles. Evolution 66:1862–1877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01538.x

  54. Martín MP, Zhang LF, Fernández-López J, Dueñas M, Rodríguez-Armas JL et al (2018) Hyphoderma paramacaronesicum sp. nov. (Meruliaceae, Polyporales, Basidiomycota), a cryptic lineage to H. macaronesicum. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 2:57–68. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2018.02.05

  55. Martínez S, Nakasone KK (2014) New records of interesting corticioid Basidiomycota from Uruguay. Check List 10:1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.15560/10.5.1237

  56. McKenzie EHC, Buchanan PK, Johnston PR (2000) Checklist of fungi on Nothofagus species in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 38:635–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2000.9512711

  57. Melo I, Cardoso J, Telleria MT (2007) Annotated list of polypores for the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Bibliotheca Mycologica 203:1–183

  58. Moncalvo JM, Buchanan PK (2008) Molecular evidence for long distance dispersal across the southern hemisphere in the Ganoderma applanatum-australe species complex (Basidiomycota). Mycological Research 112:425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.12.001

  59. Mueller GM, Schmit JP, Leacock PR, Buyck B, Cifuentes J et al (2007) Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9108-8

  60. Nagy LG, Kocsubé S, Csanádi Z, Kovács GM, Petkovits T et al (2012) Re-mind the gap! Insertion – deletion data reveal neglected phylogenetic potential of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of fungi. PLoS One 7:e49794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049794

  61. Öpik M, Davison J, Moora M, Pärtel M, Zobel M (2016) Response to comment on “global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism”. Science 351:826. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5495

  62. Parmasto E, Parmasto I (1992) Size and shape of basidiospores in the Hymenomycetes. Mycologia Helvetica 5:47–78

  63. Paulus B, Hallenberg N, Buchanan PK, Chambers GK (2000) A phylogenetic study of the genus Schizopora (Basidiomycota) based on ITS DNA sequences. Mycological Research 104:1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756200002720

  64. Peterson KR, Pfister DH, Bell CD (2010) Cophylogeny and biogeography of the fungal parasite Cyttaria and its host Nothofagus, southern beech. Mycologia 102:1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-048

  65. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Tracer. Version 1.6. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/. Accessed: January 2018

  66. Raxworthy CJ, Ingram CM, Rabibisoa N, Pearson RG (2007) Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Systematic Biology 56:907–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701775111

  67. R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  68. Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Collar DC (2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Systematic Biology 57:591–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802302427

  69. Riebesehl J, Langer E (2017) Hyphodontia s.l. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): 35 new combinations and new keys to all 120 current species. Mycological Progress 16:637–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1299-8

  70. Rissler LJ, Apodaca JJ (2007) Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Systematic Biology 56:924–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701703063

  71. Robert V, Stegehuis G, Stalpers J (2005) The MycoBank engine and related databases. http://www.mycobank.org. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  72. Robert V, Vu D, Amor ABH, van de Wiele N, Brouwer C et al (2013) MycoBank gearing up for new horizons. IMA Fungus 4:371–379. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.16

  73. Ryvarden L, Gilbertson RL (1994) European Polypores. Part. 2. [synopsis Fungorum no. 7.] Fungiflora, Oslo, Norway

  74. Ryvarden L, Melo I (2014) Poroid Fungi of Europe. [synopsis Fungorum no. 31]. Fungiflora, Oslo, Norway

  75. Salgado-Salazar C, Rossman AY, Chaverri P (2013) Not as ubiquitous as we thought: taxonomic crypsis, hidden diversity and cryptic speciation in the cosmopolitan fungus Thelonectria discophora (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales, Ascomycota). PLoS One 8(10):e76737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076737

  76. Sanmartín I, Ronquist F (2004) Southern hemisphere biogeography inferred by event-based models: plant versus animal patterns. Systematic Biology 53:216–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490423430

  77. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL et al (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109:6241–6246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117018109

  78. Schoener TW (1970) Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935376

  79. Scotese CR, Gahagan LM, Larson RL (1988) Plate tectonic reconstructions of the cretaceous and Cenozoic Ocean basins. Tectonophysics 155:27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(88)90259-4

  80. Seberg O (1991) Biogeographic congruence in the South Pacific. Australian Systematic Botany 4:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB9910127

  81. Spegazzini C (1902) Mycetes argentinenses. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Buenos Aires 3:1–53 https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/50873

  82. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, UK

  83. Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM et al (2000) Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228

  84. Taylor JW, Turner E, Townsend JP, Dettman JR, Jacobson D (2006) Eukaryotic microbes, species recognition and the geographic limits of species: examples from the kingdom Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 361:1947–1963. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1923

  85. Tura D, Zmitrovich IV, Wasser SP, Spirin WA, Nevo E (2011) Biodiversity of the Heterobasidiomycetes and non-gilled Hymenomycetes (former Aphyllophorales) of Israel. A.R.A. Gantner Verlag K.G., Liechtenstein

  86. Viner I, Spirin V, Zíbarová L, Larsson KH (2018) Additions to the taxonomy of Lagarobasidium and Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota). MycoKeys 41:65–890. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.41.28987

  87. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x

  88. Wiens JJ (2007) Species delimitation: new approaches for discovering diversity. Systematic Biology 56:875–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701748506

  89. Wilson AW, Hosaka K, Mueller GM (2017a) Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytologist 213:1862–1873. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14270

  90. Wilson AW, Mueller GM, May TW (2017b) Biogeography of the ectomycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. In: Tedersoo L (ed) Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 273–297. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland

  91. World Data Centre for Microorganisms (2011). http://www.wfcc.info/ccinfo/search/. Accessed: April 2016

  92. Zhou LW, Nakasone KK, Burdsall HH, Ginns J, Vlasák J et al (2016) Polypore diversity in North America with an annotated checklist. Mycological Progress 15:771–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1207-7

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Daniel L. Lindner and Karen Nakasone from the Forest Products Laboratory (USDA), Adrienne Stanton, Duckchul Park and Peter R. Johnston from Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland, Reihard Fitzek from San Ignacio del Huinay Foundation, Chile, and the curators of CFMR, NY, and PPD for their invaluable assistance arranging specimens and culture loans and during fieldwork. Thanks to Marian Glenn (Seton Hall University) for comments to the manuscript. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Adherence to national and international regulations

All necessary permits were obtained for the described field trip (Huinay, Los lagos region, Chile).

Funding

This work was supported by the Plan Nacional I + D + i projects n° CGL2012–35559, CGL2015–67459-P and by the CSIC/Fundación Endesa/Fundación San Ignacio de Huinay project (2011HUIN10; 2013CL0012). JFL was supported by a Predoctoral Grant from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain) (BES-2013-066429).

Author information

Conceptualization: MTT, JFL, MD, MPM. Data curation: JFL, MD, MTT, MPM. Formal analysis: JFL, MPM, MD, MTT. Analyzed the data: JFL, MTT, MD, AWW, MP, MPM. Funding acquisition: MTT, MD, MPM. Investigation: JFL, MTT, MD, AWW, MP, MPM. Methodology: JFL, MTT, MD, AWW, MP, PKB, GMM, MPM. Project administration: MTT. Resources: MTT, MD, MPM, JFL. Supervision: MTT, MPM, MD. Validation: JFL, MTT, MD, MPM. Visualization JFL, MD, MTT, MPM. Writing-original draft: JFL, MTT, MD, AWW, MP, PKB, GMM, MPM. Writing-review & Editing: JFL, MTT, MD, MPM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to María P. Martín.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that not competing interest exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-López, J., Telleria, M.T., Dueñas, M. et al. Addressing the diversity of Xylodon raduloides complex through integrative taxonomy. IMA Fungus 10, 9 (2019) doi:10.1186/s43008-019-0010-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Basidiomycota
  • Biogeography
  • Corticioid fungi
  • Environmental niche
  • Hymenochaetales
  • Morphological traits
  • Multilocus phylogeny
  • New taxa