Skip to main content


A revision of Salispina, its placement in a new family, Salispinaceae (Rhipidiales), and description of a fourth species, S. hoi sp. nov


The genus Salispina was recently described for saprotrophic estuarine oomycetes with aculeolate or spiny sporangia. The genus currently contains three species, S. intermedia, S. lobata, and S. spinosa, the latter two previously included in Halophytophthora. During a survey of mangrove-inhabiting oomycetes in the Philippines, an isolate of Salispina (USTCMS 1611), was obtained from a decaying mangrove leaf. This isolate differed from other species in the genus in a unique combination of morphological and biological characters. Phylogenetic analysis revealed it to be the sister lineage of S. lobata. Consequently, the new species name S. hoi is introduced for the isolate. In addition, Salispina spp. grouped with Sapromyces of Rhipidiales with strong support, but differs from all other known genera of the order in the weak formation of hyphal constrictions, and absence of basal thalli and a holdfast network. The new family Salispinaceae is, therefore, described to accommodate Salispina in the order Rhipidiales.


Mangroves are inhabited by saprotrophic oomycetes, fungal-like eukaryotes in the kingdom Straminipila (Fell & Master 1975, Leaño et al. 2000, Leaño 2001, Thines 2014, Marano et al. 2016, Bennett et al. 2017a). These organisms are the first colonisers of fallen senescent mangrove leaves and, thus, have an important role in the nutrient cycling in estuarine ecosystems (Newell et al. 1987, Nakagiri et al. 1989, Leaño et al. 2000). Of the diverse mangrove oomycetes, Salispina is a genus currently comprising three described species (Li et al. 2016): S. intermedia (type species), S. spinosa (syn. Phytophthora spinosa var. spinosa, Halophytophthora spinosa var. spinosa), and S. lobata (syn. Phytophthora spinosa var. lobata, Halophytophthora spinosa var. lobata). This genus was erected to accommodate saprotrophic mangrove oomycetes with aculeolate or spiny, variously shaped sporangia, and direct zoospore release through an apical discharge tube. However, the higher taxonomic affinity of Salispina remained uncertain, and the genus was not assigned to a family or order (Li et al. 2016).

In the Philippines, Leaño (2001) recognized S. lobata (as H. spinosa var. lobata) as the first record of Salispina for the Philippines, and we did not find any other report of these organisms in the Philippines. It was the aim of this study to investigate the presence of additional species of Salispina in Philippine mangroves, and to resolve the family and order classiication.

Materials and Methods

Isolation, morphological investigation, and sporulation

The isolation and purification of the isolate used in this study, which came from decaying leaves collected from mangroves at Davao del Sur, Philippines, followed the method of Bennett & Thines (2017). For morphological investigations, samples were processed as described in Bennett & Thines (2017), but values were rounded to the nearest half micron, except for mean values. For sporulation, the development of sporangia from agarised media plugs was observed in saline concentrations of 0–3 % incubated at room temperature (20–25 °C) in a dark compartment. Zoospore release was induced by placing mycelia with mature sporangia in a saline solution (≥ 3.5 %) and at 35 °C without light. Colony radial growth at 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C was tested in vegetable juice agar (VJA, commercial V8 Juice, Campbell or Alnatura Gemüsesaft, Alnatura; NBRC, medium no. 15), with or without seawater (; and potato carrot agar (PCA; Crous et al. 2009), based on Alnatura Demeter Karotten mit Kartoffeln, Alnatura). Mean colony radial growth was measured for five days and expressed as mm/day following the method of Solis et al. (2010).

Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611, S. spinosa CBS 591.85, and S. lobata CBS 588.85 were tested for growth in VJA at room temperature (20–25 °C) for 5 d using a candle jar incubation method as described below and mean colony radial growth was measured according to Solis et al. (2010). For sporangium development under depleted oxygen conditions, mycelium in VJA from a 7 d-old culture plate (three per strain) was cut and the resulting pieces of 1–2 cm2 were placed in 60 mm Petri dishes containing 3 % saline solution. The Petri dishes were placed in a desiccator with a burning candle instead of silica gel. Then the desiccator was closed, allowing the candle to consume the oxygen until the flame could not be supported anymore. Subsequently, the desiccator was incubated at room temperature (20–25°C). Another set-up was incubated in ambient air on a work-bench at room temperature (20–25 °C). For zoospore release, the same settings were used, except for incubation at 35 °C and a saline solution of 3.5 %.

DNA Extraction and PCR amplification

For DNA extraction, a phenol-isoamyl-chloroform method was used (Bennett et al. 2017b). Subsequently, PCR amplification of cytochrome oxidase 1 (cox1), cytochrome oxidase 2 (cox2), and large nuclear ribosomal subunit (nrLSU) was done using the PCR primers listed in Table 1. The PCR reaction mix contained 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.8 µg BSA, 0.4 µM of each primer, 0.5 U Taq polymerase and 10–50 ng DNA. PCR amplification of the cox1 region was done with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 40 s, annealing at 51 °C for 40 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s. Afinal elongation was done at 72 °C for 5 min. The cycling conditions for the cox2 region included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 51 °C for 40 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 40 s. A final elongation was carried out at 72 °C for 4 min.

Table 1 PCR Primers used in this study.

For the LSU region, the cycling conditions were as follows: — initial denaturation 95 °C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, annealing at 53 °C for 20 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 120 s. Subsequently, a final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 7 min.

PCR amplicons were sent to the SBiK-F Central Laboratory for sequencing with the primers used for PCR amplification. Sequences were assembled, converted into contigs and edited using Geneious version 5.0.4 (Biomatters, New Zealand). The resulting contigs were exported in fasta file format along with reference sequences selected from NCBI ( (Table 2). The resulting sequences were uploaded to the TrEase phylogeny webserver ( for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree reconstruction. The program MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2002) was used for multiple sequence alignment of cox1, cox2, and nrLSU sequences. Specifically, the FFT-NS-1 (fast) model was the chosen algorithm for cox1 and cox2 due to the absence of gaps and because taxa used in the multiple sequence alignments were closely related species. The G-INS-i was the algorithm used for nrLSU sequences. The primary phylogenetic tree, Minimum Evolution (ME), was generated using FastTree (Price et al. 2009), with 1000 bootstrap replicates and following the Generalized Time-Reversible (GTR) algorithm. Maximum Likelihood (ML) was generated using RAxML (Stamatakis 2014) where GTR-GAMMA was the chosen algorithm supported by 1000 bootstrap replications. Bayesian Inference was done using MrBayes (Ronquist et al. 2012) with the GTR model of substitutions and running four incrementally heated chains for 1 000 000 generations, discarding the first 30 % of the resulting trees to ensure sampling of trees and posterior probability calculations from the stationary phase. After making sure no supported incongruences were present for the different loci, alignments of cox1, cox2, and nrLSU sequences were concatenated using SequenceMatrix (Vaidya et al. 2010) and phylogenetic trees were computed as outlined above. Phylogenetic trees were viewed and annotated using MEGA, version 6 and 7 (Tamura et al. 2013).

Table 2 GenBank* sequences (accession numbers) used in this study.



Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611 was isolated from decaying leaves collected from mangroves at Davao del Sur. Colony morphology of the isolate was appressed on both VJA and PCA (Fig. 1AB). The strain developed aculeolate sporangia similar to known taxa of Salispina (Fig. 1) (Table 3). Hyphae were 2–9 µm wide, with retraction septae forming in some hyphae in old cultures submerged in 2–3 % saline solution incubated at room temperature (20–25 °C). The branching pattern was irregular. Sporulation was achieved when plugs with mycelia were placed in 2–3 % saline solution and incubated at room temperature (20–25 °C) in the dark. Sporangiogenic hyphae are not differentiated from vegetative hyphae until the hyphal apex swells to form a protosporangium (Fig. 1CD). The sporangia are ovoid, clavate, globose to obpyriform (Fig. 1EJ) but some were irregularly shaped (Fig. 1H); they measured (33.5−)43–57.5–77.5(−87) × (10.5−)20–36.5–66(−75.5) (n = 100). Spines were predominantly forming at the apex of the sporangia, resulting in a crown-like appearance (Fig. 1 D–E, J), while some sporangia were partially covered in spines, rarely entirely aculeolate (Fig. 1 F–H, J), or smooth-walled sporangia were observed (not depicted). The sporangia were non-caducous and non-papillate. The sporangial content was vacuolated. The inner base of the sporangia, where the basal plug is located, was concave (Fig. 1 I, K). The basal plug was observed to be hyaline, separating the sporangiogenic hypha from the sporangium. Zoospore release occurred only when mycelium with mature sporangia was placed in a saline solution with ≥ 3.5 % and incubated at 35 °C. The apex of the dehiscence tube (Fig. 1 I–J) deliquesces and zoospores swim directly out from the tube, i.e. no vesicle was observed. No chlamydospores and gametangia were observed. A summary of morphological features of known Salispina spp. is given in Table 3.

Fig. 1

Morphology of Salispina hoi (USTCMS 1611). Colony pattern on: A. Potato carrot agar (PCA), and B. Vegetable juice agar (VJA). C. Protosporangium. D. Immature or young sporangium. E–H. Mature sporangia; spines are forming at the apex of sporangia, while others are either having scattered spines on the surface of the sporangia or a smooth surface. H. Irregularly-shaped aculeolate sporangium. I–J. Sporangia with dehiscence tube (arrow), zoospores differentiate inside the sporangia. K. Empty sporangium. Bars: A–B = 30 mm, C–K = 20 µm.

Table 3 Morphology of Salispina species.

The mean colony radial growth of Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611 in VJA and PCA at different temperatures is given in Fig. 2A. The growth and sporulation of the three Salispina spp. in VJA in candle jar incubation at room temperature ( 20–25 °C) are presented in Fig. 2B.

Fig. 2

Mean colony radial growth. A. Mean colony radial growth of Salispina hoi (USTCMS 1611) on VJA and PCA at different temperatures. B. Mean colony radial growth of the three Salispina species on VJA at room temperature in a candle jar. (++) = sporulation both under candle jar and ambient air conditions; (+) = sporulation under ambient air condition.


The multigene phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3) and the singlegene phylogenetic trees (Figs S1–S3) showed that USTCMS 1611 is a distinct member of the Salispina clade, with maximum support in all analyses. Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611 was not conspecific with any known species of Salispina (Figs S1, S3), and grouped as sister to S. lobata (Figs S1–S2). In addition, the genus Salispina was found to be sister to Sapromyces elongatus (Rhipidiaceae, Rhipidiales) with strong to maximum support in the phylogenetic reconstruction based on the concatenated dataset with nuclear and mitochondrial loci (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree based on concatenated sequences of cox1, cox2, and LSU. Minimum Evolution (ME) was used as the primary tree with bootstrap support values from ME, and Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Bayesian posterior probability. (-) indicates bootstrap support values lower than 50 % or unsupported alternating topology from the corresponding primary tree. Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.


The genus Salispina was proposed based on phylogenetics and sporangial characteristics with Salispina intermedia as the type species (Li et al. 2016). The two additional species, S. spinosa and S. lobata, were first considered to be members of Phytophthora (Fell & Master 1975; as Ph. spinosa var. spinosa, and Ph. spinosa var. lobata, respectively), and later transferred to Halophytophthora (Ho & Jong 1990; as H. spinosa var. spinosa, and H. spinosa var. lobata) based on their occurrence in estuarine environments. However, Nakagiri (2002) reported in a conference note that S. spinosa (referred to as H. spinosa) has close affinities to Sapromyces of Rhipidiales. Phylogenetic analyses in the present study revealed a strongly supported sister-group relationship between Sapromyces elongatus, which is the only species of Rhipidiales with sequences deposited at NCBI, and Salispina.

The family Rhipidiaceae includes Araiospora (Thaxter 1896), Aqualinderella (Emerson & Weston 1967), Mindeniella (Kanouse 1927), Nellymyces (Batko 1971), Rhipidium (Cornu 1871), and Sapromyces (Fritsch 1893). These taxa occur in freshwater habitats anchored to submerged twigs and fruits (Sparrow 1960, Beakes & Thines 2017). Most members of the family have arborescent thalli (except Mindeniella and Sapromyces) with a more or less distinct basal cell derived from a germinated zoospore (Minden 1916), a holdfast network, and all known members feature jointed or constricted hyphae, as well as stalked sporangia and gametangia (Sparrow 1960, Blackwell et al. 2015). Sporangia of members of the family are either aculeolate or smooth-walled. Examples with aculeolate sporangia include Araiospora spinosa (syn. Rhipidium spinosum) (Thaxter 1896), A. coronata (Linder 1926), A. pulchra (Kevorkian 1934), A. streptandra (Kevorkian 1934, Shanor & Olive 1942), M. spinospora (Kanouse 1927, Sparrow & Cutter 1941), M. asymmetria (Johnson 1951), and N. megaceros (Batko 1971). The formation of spines was believed to be influenced by the availability of nutrients in the substrate as outlined below. Mindeniella has the tendency to form aculeolate sporangia after colonies are well established in the substrate (Kanouse 1927, Sparrow & Cutter 1941). However, Sparrow (1960) mentioned that Ralph Emerson had informed him that there was a correlation between the formation of spines and the near absence of oxygen in axenic cultures. Zoospore release in the family is either directly through a discharge tube (e.g. Aqualinderella fermentans, M. asymmetria) or a vesicle (e.g. Araiospora coronata, M. spinospora, R. americanum). The discharge tube is generally formed at the sporangial apex, but its length varies in different species. Gametangia of Rhipidiaceae are often pedicellate, and some species apparently produce oospores parthenogenically (e.g. Aqualinderella fermentans, M. spinospora, N. megaceros, R. parthenosporum), similar to Phytophthora insolita (Ann & Ko 1980). Several members of Rhipidiaceae were reported to grow in low oxygen concentrations (e.g. Aqualinderella, Mindeniella, Rhipidium) (Emerson & Weston 1967, Gleason 1968, Dogma 1975, Natvig 1981) and, hence, can be considered as facultative anaerobes. Dick (2001) suggested in his diagnosis of the order Rhipidiales that members had either a facultative or an obligate fermentative metabolism.

In not displaying hyphal constrictions or stalked sporangia, Salispina is morphologically divergent from the accepted genera of Rhipidiaceae. Interestingly, Fell & Master (1975) inferred that nutrition plays an important role in the development of spines in S. spinosa (as Phytophthora spinosa var. spinosa), similar to the conclusions presented before by Kanouse (1927), Sparrow & Cutter (1941), and Sparrow (1960) for Rhipidiaceae. The three strains of Salispina (S. lobata CBS 588.85, S. spinosa CBS 591.85, and Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611) tested in this study were able to grow in a candle jar arrangement, where atmospheric oxygen is around 10–14 % and carbon dioxide about 2–5 % (Luechtefeld et al. 1982, El-Sherbeeny 1996). In a mangrove environment, abiotic factors (i.e. salinity, temperature, and oxygen concentration) constantly fluctuate (Leaño et al. 2000, Kathiresan 2004, Krauss et al. 2008). In particular, the oxygen concentration is often depleted during low tide, and gas production (e.g. CH4, NH3, H2S) by anaerobic bacteria can be observed (Kathiresan 2004). This provides suitable conditions for both obligate or facultative anaerobes and microaerophiles. In line with the fermentative or microaerophilic habit observed for various members of Rhipidiales, Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611 showed normal vegetative growth in candle jars, but sporulation of members of Salispina was triggered by normal oxygen levels, and increased salinity and temperature, conditions that probably correspond to the early rise of the sea level after a low tide. While the physiological properties of Salispina support placement in Rhipidiales, the high morphological and phylogenetic divergence between Salispina and members of the Rhipidiaceae does not support a placement of Salispina in that family. Such a taxonomic classification would render the morphologically well-delineated family highly heterogenous. We therefore introduce the new family name Salispinaceae to accommodate the genus Salispina.

Salispina sp. USTCMS 1611 is a sister taxon to S. lobata, which has sporangia with a peculiar shape. Initially obpyriform, the sporangia of S. lobata subsequently develop lateral lobes until the sporangium looks botryose (Fell & Master 1975). However, USTCMS 1611 has ovoid, clavate, globose, to obpyriform sporangia, with some sporangia showing variations in shape, but not becoming botryose. In addition, the formation of spines appears to be different between the two species, with most spines of USTCMS 1611 formed at the apex of the sporangium, while some sporangia have scattered spines or are even smooth-walled. In contrast, sporangia of S. lobata are either entirely or partially aculeolate (with no distinct pattern), or non-aculeolate (Table 3). Based on morphology and phylogenetic relationships, this strain cannot be assigned to any known taxon in Salispina, and so is described here as a new species.

This raises the number of known species in Salispina to four, but, given the still fragmentary knowledge regarding estuarine oomycetes in general and Salispina in particular, it seems likely that additional species of this genus will be discovered. In contrast to other orders of Oomycota, such as Albuginales (Choi et al. 2007, Thines et al. 2009, Ploch et al. 2010, Ploch & Thines 2011, Mirzaee et al. 2013), Peronosporales (Riethmüller et al. 2002, Voglmayr 2003, Voglmayr et al. 2004, Thines et al. 2006, 2007, Göker et al. 2007, Thines et al. 2008, 2015, Choi & Thines 2015), and Saprolegniales (Dick et al. 1999, Riethmüller et al. 1999, Leclerc et al. 2000, Spencer et al. 2002, Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 2007, Hulvey et al. 2007, Steciow et al. 2013, Sandoval-Sierra et al. 2014, Steciow et al. 2014, Rocha et al. 2018), the Rhipidiales has received relatively little attention, probably owing to a lower degree of cultivation success from environmental samples due to their often microaerophilic to anaerobic nature. Thus, it seems promising to undertake targeted sampling in oxygen-depleted limnic environments in order to gain further insights into these understudied organisms which might play an important role in nutrient cycling.


Rhipidiales M. W. Dick, Straminipilous Fungi: 305 (2001).

Salispinaceae R. Bennett & Thines, fam. nov. MycoBank MB824253

Diagnosis: Differs from Rhipidiaceae in the absence of conspicuous hyphal constrictions.

Type: Salispina Marano et al., Fungal Diversity 78: 198 (2016).

Salispina hoi R. Bennett & Thines, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB823076

Etymology: Dedicated to Hon Ho, for his pioneering studies into mangrove oomycetes.

Diagnosis: Differ from its sister taxon, S. lobata in sporangia that do not become botryose at maturity and from all species of the genus by a pronounced preference of spine formation at the apex and a quickly evanescing discharge tube.

Type: Philippines: Davao del Sur, 6.579667°N 125.453667°E, isolated from decaying mangrove leaf litter, 6 Sep. 2015, R.M. Bennett, M.K. Devanadera, & G.R. Dedeles (USTH 014145 — holotype; USTCMS 1611 – ex-type culture).

Description: Mycelium appressed on VJA and PCA. Hyphae 2–9 µm wide; septae forming at maturity, branching irregular; sporangiogenic hyphae not differentiated from vegetative hyphae, bearing a single terminal sporangium. Sporangia, shape ovoid, globose, obpyriform to variable; size (33.5−) 43–57.6–77.5(−87) × (10.5−)20–36.6–66(−75.5) µm; papilla absent, basal plug concave and hyaline; sporangial content vacuolate; surface aculeolate, with spines mostly forming at the apex of sporangia resulting in a crown-like appearance, some sporangia are smooth or with very few scattered spines. Zoospores discharge directly through a dehiscence tube; the apex of the tube deliquescent, allowing zoospores to escape from sporangia; vesicle absent. Chlamydospores not observed. Gametangia not observed.

Sequences: cox1 MG019399, cox2 MF991430, and LSU MG385863.


  1. Ann PJ, Ko WH (1980) Phytophthora insolita, a new species from Taiwan. Mycologia 72: 1180–1185.

  2. Batko A (1971) Nellymyces megaceros gen. et sp. nov. — a new aquatic phycomycete related to Aqualinderella and Araiospora. Acta Mycologica 7: 251–268.

  3. Beakes GW, Thines M (2017) Hyphochytriomycota and Oomycota. In: Handbook of the Protists (Archibald J, Simpson A, Slamovits C, eds): 435–505. Heidelberg: Springer.

  4. Bennett RM, de Cock AWAM, Levesque CA, Thines M (2017a) Calycofera gen. nov., an estuarine sister taxon to Phytopythium, Peronosporaceae. Mycological Progress 16: 947–954.

  5. Bennett RM, Dedeles GR, Thines M (2017b) Phytophthora elongata (Peronosporaceae) is present as an estuarine species in Philippine mangroves. Mycosphere 8: 959–967.

  6. Bennett RM, Thines M (2017) Confirmation that Phytophthora insolita (Peronosporaceae) is present as a marine saprotroph on mangrove leaves and first report of the species for the Philippines. Nova Hedwigia 105: 185–196.

  7. Blackwell WH, Letcher PM, Powell MJ (2015) A review and update of the genus Sapromyces (Straminipila: Oomycota). Phytologia 97: 82–93.

  8. Choi YJ, Beakes G, Glockling S, Kruse J, Nam B, et al. (2015) Towards a universal barcode of oomycetes — a comparison of the coxl and cox2 loci. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 1275–1288.

  9. Choi YJ, Shin HD, Hong SB, Thines M (2007) Morphological and molecular discrimination among Albugo Candida materials infecting Capsella bursa-pastoris world-wide. Fungal Diversity 27: 11–34.

  10. Choi YJ, Thines M (2015) Host jumps and radiation, not co-divergence, drives diversification of obligate pathogens: a new case study in downy mildews and Asteraceae. PLOS One 10:

  11. Cornu M (1871) Note sur deux genres nouveaux de la famille des Saprolegniees: Rhipidium et Monoblepharis. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 18: 58–59.

  12. Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, et al. (2009) Fungal Biodiversity. [CBS Laboratory Manual Series no. 1.] Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Institute.

  13. Dick MW (2001) Straminipilous Fungi: systematics of the Peronosporomycetes including accounts of the marine straminipilous protists, the plasmodiophorids and similar organisms. Dordrecht: Springer.

  14. Dick MW, Vick MC, Gibbings JG, Hedderson TA, Lopez-Lastra CC (1999) 18S rDNA for species of Leptolegnia and other Peronosporomycetes justification of the subclass taxa Saprolegniomy-cetidae and Peronosporomycetidae and division of the Sapro-legniaceae sensu lato into the Leptolegniaceae and Saprolegni-aceae. Mycological Research 103: 1119–1125.

  15. Dieguez-Uribeondo J, Fregeneda- Grandes JM, Cerenius L, Perez- Iniesta M, Aller-Gancedo JM, et al. (2007) Re-evaluation of the enigmatic species complex Saprolegnia diclina-Saprolegnia parasitica based on morphological, physiological and molecular data. Fungal Genetics and Biology 44: 585–601.

  16. Dogma I (1975) Of Philippine mycology and lower fungi. Kalikasan 4: 69–105.

  17. El-Sherbeeny MR (1996) Use of a candle jar for incubating Campylobacter jejuni. In: Campylobacters, Helicobacters, and related Organisms (Newell DG, Ketley JM, Feldman RA, eds): 89–92. New York: Springer.

  18. Emerson R, Weston WH (1967) Aqualinderella fermentans, gen. et sp. nov., a phycomycete adapted to stagnant waters. I. American Journal of Botany 54: 702–719.

  19. Fell JW, Master IM (1975) Phycomycetes (Phytophthora spp. nov. and Pythium sp. nov.) associated with degrading mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 2908–2922.

  20. Fritsch K (1893) Nomenclatorische Bemerkungen. Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 43: 420–421.

  21. Gleason FH (1968) Nutritional comparisons in the Leptomitales. American Journal of Botany 55: 1003–1010.

  22. Goker M, Voglmayr H, Riethmuller A, Oberwinkler F (2007) How do obligate parasites evolve? A multi-gene phylogenetic analysis of downy mildews. Fungal Genetics and Biology 44: 105–122.

  23. Ho HH, Jong SC (1990) Halophytophthora, gen. nov, a new member of the family Pythiaceae. Mycotaxon 36: 377–382.

  24. Hudspeth DSS, Nadler SA, Hudspeth MES (2000) Acox2 molecular phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes. Mycologia 92: 674–684.

  25. Hulvey JP, Padgett DE, Bailey JC (2007) Species boundaries within Saprolegnia (Saprolegniales, Oomycota) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Mycologia 99: 421–429.

  26. Johnson TW (1951) A new Mindeniella from submerged, rosaceous fruits. American Journal of Botany 38: 71–78.

  27. Kanouse BB (1927) A monographic study of special groups of the water molds I. Blastocladiaceae. American Journal of Botany 14: 287–306.

  28. Kathiresan K (2004) Ecology and Environment of Mangrove Ecosystems. Chidambaram: Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamali University.

  29. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3059–3066.

  30. Kevorkian AG (1934) The structure and development of a new aquatic phycomycete. Mycologia 26: 145–152.

  31. Krauss KW, Lovelock CE, Mckee KL, Lopez-Hoffman L, Ewe SML, et al. (2008) Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquatic Botany 89: 105–127.

  32. Leaño EM (2001) Straminipilous organisms from fallen mangrove leaves from Panay Island, Philippines. Fungal Diversity 6: 75–81.

  33. Leaho EM, Jones EBG, Vrijmoed LPP (2000) Why are Halophytophthora species well adapted to mangrove habitats? Fungal Diversity 5: 131–151.

  34. Leclerc MC, Guillot J, Deville M (2000) Taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of Saprolegniaceae (Oomycetes) inferred from LSU rDNAand ITS sequence comparisons. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 77: 369–377.

  35. Li GJ, Hyde KD, Zhao RL, Hongsana S, Abdel-Aziz FA, et al. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 253-366: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 78: 1–237.

  36. Luechtefeld NW, Reller LB, Blaser MJ, Wang WL (1982) Comparison of atmospheres of incubation for primary isolation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni from animal specimens: 5% oxygen versus candle jar. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 56: 53–57.

  37. Linder DH (1926) A new species of Araiospora from British Guiana. Mycologia 18: 172–178.

  38. Marano AV, Jesus AL, de Souza Jl, Jeronimo GH, Gongalves DR, et al. (2016) Ecological roles of saprotrophic Peronosporales (Oomycetes, Straminipila) in natural environments. Fungal Ecology 19: 77–88.

  39. Minden M. (1916) BeiträgezurBiologie und Systematik einheimischer submerser Phycomyceten. Mykologische Untersuchungen und Berichte 2: 146–255.

  40. Mirzaee MR, Ploch S, Runge F, Telle S, Nigrelli L, et al. (2013) A new presumably widespread species of Albugo parasitic to Strigosella spp. (Brassicaceae). Mycological Progress 12: 45–52.

  41. Moncalvo JM, Wang HH, Hseu RS (1995) Phylogenetic relationships in Ganoderma inferred from internal transcribed spacers and 25S ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 87: 223–238.

  42. Nakagiri A (2002) Diversity and phylogeny of Halophytophthora (Oomycetes). In: Book of abstracts of the IMC7 — The 7th International Mycological Congress: 19. Oslo: 7th International Mycologcial Congress.

  43. Nakagiri A, Tokumasu S, Araki H, Koreada S, Tubaki K (1989) Succession of fungi in decomposing mangrove leaves in Japan. In: Recent Advances in Microbial Ecology. Proceedings of the 5thInternational Symposium on Microbial Ecology (Hattori T, Ishida Y Maruyama Y, Morita RY, Uchida A, eds): 297–301. Tokyo: ISMES Japan Scientific Societies Press.

  44. Natvig DO (1981) New evidence for true facultative anaerobiosis in two members of the Rhipidiaceae with notes on occurrence frequencies and substratum preferences. Mycologia 73: 531–541.

  45. Newell SY, Miller JD, Fell JW (1987) Rapid and pervasive occupation of fallen mangrove leaves by a marine zoosporic fungus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 2464–2469.

  46. Ploch S, Choi YJ, Rost C, Shin HD, Schilling E, et al. (2010) Evolution of diversity in Albugo is driven by high host specificity and multiple speciation events on closely related Brassicaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 812–820.

  47. Ploch S, Thines M (2011) Obligate biotrophic pathogens of the genus Albugo are widespread asymptomatic endophytes in natural populations of Brassicaceae. Molecular Ecology 20: 3692–3699.

  48. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP (2009) FastTree: computing large minimum-evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 1641–1650.

  49. Riethmüller A, Voglmayr H, Göker M, Weiszleig M, Oberwinkler F (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of the downy mildews (Peronosporales) and related groups based on nuclear large ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 94: 834–849.

  50. Riethmiiller A, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F (1999) Phylogenetic studies of Saprolegniomycetidae and related groups based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 1790–1800.

  51. Rocha SCO, Lopez-Lastra CC, Marano AV, de Souza Jl, Rueda-Paramo ME, et al. (2018) New phylogenetic insights into Saprolegniales (Oomycota, Straminipila) based upon studies of specimens isolated from Brazil and Argentina. Mycological Progress: -x.

  52. Robideau GP, de Cock AWAM, Coffey MD, Voglmayr H, Brouwer H, et al. (2011) DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase I and internal transcribed spaces. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 1002–1011.

  53. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.

  54. Sandoval-Sierra JV, Martin MP, Dieguez-Uribeindi J (2014) Species identification in the genus Saprolegnia (Oomycetes): defining DNA-based molecular operational units. Fungal Biology 118: 559–578.

  55. Shanor L, Olive LS (1942) Notes on Araiospora streptandra. Mycologia 34: 536–542.

  56. Solis MJL, Draeger S, Dela Cruz TEE (2010) Marine-derived fungi from Kappaphycus alvarezii and K. striatum as potential causative agents of ice-ice disease in farmed seaweeds. Botanica Marina 53: 587–594.

  57. Sparrow FK (1960) Aquatic Phycomycetes: exclusive of the Saprolegniaceae and Pythium. [University of Michigan Studies, Scientific Series vol. 15.] Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  58. Sparrow FK, Cutter VM (1941) Observations on Mindeniella spinospora. Mycologia 33: 288–293.

  59. Spencer MA, Vick MC, Dick MW (2002) A revision of Aplanopsis, Pythiopsis, and ‘subcentric’ Achlya species (Saprolegniaceae) using 18S rDNA and morphological data. Mycological Research 106: 549–560.

  60. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis for large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.

  61. Steciow MM, Lara E, Paul C, Pillonel A, Belbahri L (2014) Multiple barcode assessment within Saprolegnia-Achlya clade (Saprolegniales, Oomycota, Straminipila) brings order in neglected group of pathogens. IMA Fungus 5: 439–448.

  62. Steciow MM, Lara E, Pillonel A, Pelizza SA, Lestani EA, et al. (2013) Incipient loss of flagella in the genus Geolegnia: the emergence of a new clade within Leptolegnia? IMA Fungus. 4: 169–175.

  63. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729.

  64. Thaxter R (1896) New or peculiar aquatic fungi. 4. Rhipidium, Sapromyces, and Araiospora, nov. gen. Botanical Gazette 21: 317–331.

  65. Thines M (2014) Phylogeny and evolution of plant pathogenic oomycetes — a global overview. European Journal of Plant Pathology 138: 431–447.

  66. Thines M, Choi YJ, Kemen E, Ploch S, Holub EB, et al. (2009) A new species of Albugo parasitic to Arabidopsis thaliana reveals new evolutionary patterns in white blister rust (Albuginaceae). Persoonia 22: 123–128.

  67. Thines M, Göker M, Oberwinkler F (2006) A revision of Bremia graminicola. Mycological Research 110: 646–656.

  68. Thines M, Göker M, Oberwinkler F, Spring O (2007) A revision of Plasmopara penniseti, with implication for the host range of the downy mildews with pyriform haustoria. Mycological Research 111: 1377–1385.

  69. Thines M, Göker M, Telle S, Ryley M, Mathur K, et al. (2008) Phylogenetic relationships in graminicolous downy mildews based on cox2 sequence data. Mycological Research 11: 345–351.

  70. Thines M, Telle S, Choi Y, Tan PY, Shivas RG (2015) Baobabopsis, a new genus of graminicolous downy mildews from tropical fungi, with an updated key to the genera of downy mildews. IMA Fungus 6: 483–491.

  71. Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2010) Sequence Matrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27: 171–180.

  72. Voglmayr H (2003) Phylogenetic study of Peronospora and related genera based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Mycological Research 107: 1132–1142.

  73. Voglmayr H, Riethmiiller A, Göker M, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of Plasmopara, Bremia, and other genera of downy mildews with pyriform haustoria based on Bayesian analysis of partial LSU rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research 108: 1011–1024.

Download references


This research project was funded by the LOEWE Excellence programme through the Integrative Fungal Research Cluster (IPF). Collection and transport permits were granted by the Biodiversity and Management Bureau, and Wildlife Export Office-NCR, Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Philippines, through IPF and USTCMS. RMB was supported by the Katholisher Akademischer Ausländer Dienst (KAAD), Goethe University, and partly by the Studienstiftung für mykologische Systematik und Ökologie.

RMB and MT conceived the study. RMB, MKD, and GRD arranged legal documents for collection, and conducted field sampling and isolation. RMB conducted laboratory work. RMB and MT analysed and interpreted the data. RMB and MT wrote the manuscript with contributions from the co-authors.

Author information

Correspondence to Marco Thines.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennett, R.M., Devanadera, M.K., Dedeles, G.R. et al. A revision of Salispina, its placement in a new family, Salispinaceae (Rhipidiales), and description of a fourth species, S. hoi sp. nov. IMA Fungus 9, 259–269 (2018).

Download citation


  • Mangrove
  • new taxa
  • Oomycota
  • phylogenetics
  • Sapromyces
  • taxonomy